Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Research Blogging Awards 2010


Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Quail Ridge Books

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« The so-called Facebook Scandal | Main | The Grand LOL-PZ Birthday Bash Linkfest »

Wall Street Journal on Open Access

Category: Open Science
Posted on: March 8, 2008 11:50 PM, by Coturnix

Information Liberation By DANIEL AKST:

If your child has a life-threatening disease and you're desperate to read the latest research, you'll be dismayed to learn that you can't -- at least not without hugely expensive subscriptions to a bevy of specialized journals or access to a major research library. Your dismay might turn to anger when you realize that you paid for this research.

Read the whole thing....

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/66242

Comments

1

"Alas, the new NIH policy will allow a 12-month lag between publication and posting on PubMed."

preposterous. how hard is it to cut and paste and upload? i guess i'm asking the wrong question.

hats off to PLoS! keep up the great work!

~C

Posted by: ~C4Chaos | March 9, 2008 8:25 AM

2

@C4Chaos,

Yes, the 12 month delay is not ideal. However, even delayed access is better than no access at all !!

Here in the UK, it's a 6 month delay (maximum) and bar 1, all of the main funders of scientific/technical/medical MANDATE that the research must be made Open Access (OA).

In the UK, it is important to note that such research must be made OA NO LATER than 6 months.

The advantage of OA Journals such as PLoS is that all Papers are OA as soon as they are published. No messing around by these folks.

Posted by: McDawg | March 9, 2008 10:21 AM

3

To provide a bit of balance (and please don't see this as me defending the evil empire)... Elsevier now has a patient research option so everyone can search Elsevier journals using ScienceDirect and then patients can order copies of articles for $4.95 each, which is just a handling fee. (researchers still have to pay the standard $35 or so) http://patient-research.elsevier.com/patientresearch/about

Posted by: Christina Pikas | March 9, 2008 10:49 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.