Now on ScienceBlogs: 'My work has been plagiarized. Now what?'

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Today's carnivals | Main | The good guys won »

A cellular riddle

Category: Basic BiologyGeneticsMicroorganismsScience Education
Posted on: May 11, 2008 4:11 PM, by Coturnix

It takes 38 minutes for the E.coli genome to replicate. Yet, E.coli can bo coaxed to divide in a much shorter time: 20 minutes. How is this possible?

Larry poses the riddle and provides the solution.

The key is that complex biochemical processes are taught sequentially, one by one, because that is how we think and process information. Yet, unless there is a need for precise timing (in which case there will be a timer triggering the starts and ends of cellular events), most processes occur all the time, simultaneously, in parallel. How do we teach that?

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/71616

Comments

1

Been there, done that. It is called "Fast Tracking". This means taking a stepwise process which should have the steps done in sequence, and doing all the steps similtaneously, rather than in sequence. The basic assumption is that all the steps will actually work.

Posted by: Jim Thomerson | May 11, 2008 5:03 PM

2

Lots of TAs?
--ml

Posted by: Martin Langeland | May 11, 2008 10:35 PM

3

A dozen or so years ago when I was taking the required biochemistry/molecular biology course in grad school, I drove the instructor nuts with my questions. She would give us all the players, all the enzymes, all the pathways, and even some of the ins/outs of energetics of the process. Then I'd ask how long it takes, is it in milliseconds, seconds, minutes or hours, how many molecules go through it at any given time, etc. In some rare cases she even knew or could guess at the answers. I am wondering if these days such questions are taken more seriously and if people study the dynamics more than they used to, or if the teaching is still limited to identifying the players and the sequence of events in a pathway.

Posted by: Coturnix | May 11, 2008 10:53 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM