Now on ScienceBlogs: In defense of hir in a male-dominated environment [Sciencewomen]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Search

Profile

away%20from%20computer.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Thanks, Jim Neal! | Main | Yay for Platypus! »

Blog about a classic science paper

Category: BloggingHistory of Science
Posted on: May 7, 2008 11:36 AM, by Coturnix

The challenge from skullsinthestars is up - pick up a very old, classic science paper and write a blog post about it. Put it in a proper historical, theoretical, methodological and philosophical context. You can always go back to blogging about the latest research or latest creationist idiocy tomorrow.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/71308

Comments

1

As Blake put it. It may even go into the Basic Concepts list afterwards, just tell John Wilkins.

Posted by: Coturnix | May 7, 2008 12:48 PM

2

How old? Any guidelines?

Posted by: PalMD | May 7, 2008 12:50 PM

3

The original challenge says "before WWII", but I think it all depends on the discipline, whenever the key classic papers were written.

Posted by: Coturnix | May 7, 2008 12:55 PM

4

Coturnix: Thanks for mentioning the "challenge"! You're absolutely right: I said "before WWII", but it's clearly discipline dependent. My personal goal was to seek out research that formed the foundations of a field, before the important concepts were taken for granted.

Posted by: gg | May 7, 2008 1:07 PM

5

What a great idea. Wish I had time to work up an entry. I'll be cheering from the sidelines.

Posted by: bill | May 7, 2008 1:19 PM

6

Oh, man, what a very neat idea! There is a paper (actually, an original paper and then one that was more like a commentary on the first from the same author) that I have always loved. Perfect for this challenge. And I can't believe it, but I found it available in PDF--I think. If I could find a copy of my thesis I could be sure. But I'm not quite sure where that is these days....

Is there a date for this? I work better with deadlines :)

Posted by: Mary | May 7, 2008 7:18 PM

7

Mary: I just posted a semi-official 'end of May' deadline for entries, just to keep people motivated! (I should have planned this at the beginning, but I wasn't necessarily expecting anyone to do the challenge...)

Posted by: gg | May 7, 2008 9:32 PM

8

@gg: gotcha! I'm gonna do it. I found the paper I was remembering. Has lines like this:

These studies have been interrupted by the war, but the initial results and the great utility of the method, should it be perfected, urge us to record the experimental data so far accumulated.

I had forgotten how much I loved this paper; this post is practically coming out of my head fully formed. Thanks so much for the inspiration.

Posted by: Mary | May 7, 2008 10:03 PM

9

Update: the deadline is end of May.

Posted by: Coturnix | May 8, 2008 8:24 AM

10

I tried to use the track-back for this post on mine, but it gives me a 404. Am I doing it wrong?

Posted by: Mary | May 8, 2008 10:01 AM

11

Trackbacks are disabled on Sb.

Posted by: Coturnix | May 8, 2008 10:03 AM

12

There's a very sad note on a classic neural crest paper by Raven and Kloos, from the mid-1940s, indicating that Kloos had been shot and killed by the Gestapo. I make the point with the grad students that it's important to maintain perspective, even when things seem really rough.

I feel compelled to write a post on a favorite classic avian neurodevelopment paper from the 1930s, however...might have to be "neural connections week" on my blog.

Posted by: Barn Owl | May 8, 2008 1:12 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM