There is Nature Network, there is Jeff's Bench, there is Facebook Scibook, Knowble.com is dead, and people are still building new social networking sites aimed at scientists. There is now SciLink (thanks Alex) and now also ResearchGATE (thanks Bertalan). I am joining everything and watching....one of these days, one of these will win. Nobody can guess which one (or perhaps more than one), but perhaps you can tell me which ones you like and dislike and why?
Search
Profile
My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Recent Posts
- The podcast of the radio show is now online
- ScienceOnline2010 - Program highlights
- Clock Quotes
- Tweetlinks, 11-07-09
- Ignite talks at ScienceOnline2010
- Clock Quotes
- Tweetlinks, 11-06-09
- Today's carnivals
- ScienceOnline2010 - introducing the participants
- New and Exciting in PLoS this week
Recent Comments
- Coturnix on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- JohnV on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- Coturnix on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- JohnV on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- Occam Razor on Will there be terrorist attacks if Obama is the President?
- DeLene on Science Cafe Raleigh: Boom 'n' Doom: Volcanoes, North Carolina and North Carolina Volcanoes
- Russell on Clock Quotes
- Russell on Clock Quotes
- Coturnix on Clock Quotes
- Russell on Clock Quotes
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
Find me on...
Make Me Happy
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Make Me Solvent
I Support
Bloggie Stuff

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
« Oldies and Goodies | Main | Doing science publicly: Interview with Jean-Claude Bradley »
Social Networking sites for scientists are proliferating....
Category: Open Science
Posted on: May 23, 2008 3:43 PM, by Coturnix
Find more posts in:
Education & Careers
Technology
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/72572












Comments
That reminds me, get yerself on FriendFeed and join the Life Scientists room that Deepak set up. It's like Twitter only useful; at least with a small group it works really well for sharing info and brief conversations/observations.
I have pretty much settled on:
LinkedIn -- for "professional" stuff, people who could give me some kind of reference or for whom I could return the favor
Facebook -- for friends
FriendFeed -- for bio/open science info and conversation
In case anyone's interested, there's also Vox, OpenWetWare, The Synaptic Leap, LaboraTree and BiomedExperts. (Google will find those; if I link 'em the Borg spamfilter will eat the post.)
Posted by: bill | May 23, 2008 4:39 PM
I shall try the FriendFeed. There are other sites, but they are discipline-specific so I did not mention them.
I also use LinkedIn for business, Facebook for friends, and also Dopplr for travel (i.e., who is there I can have beer with).
Posted by: Coturnix | May 23, 2008 4:42 PM
I think all these science-specific ones are doomed to failure. The real value of these is in network size and subfield representation. As bill says, for professional references and job leads. LinkedIn is way ahead on this and I don't really see anything being able to catch up.
Question: am I the only one to anticipate that six-online-degrees-of-Coturnix will be the next big game meme?
Posted by: DrugMonkey | May 23, 2008 6:26 PM
I'll 'friend' anyone ;-)
Posted by: Coturnix | May 23, 2008 6:51 PM
I think all these science-specific ones are doomed to failure.
Well, most of 'em will fail, or end up sidelined; that's just the web version of natural selection. I think, though, that one or two will go on to become as much a part of the everyday online landscape as blogs. If FriendFeed keeps scaling and responding to user input the way they are, my money's on them. I'm certainly finding them useful at the moment.
Posted by: bill | May 23, 2008 7:28 PM
I agree with Bill - at this moment FriendFeed is certainly useful for "Open Science" types.
Posted by: Jean-Claude Bradley | May 24, 2008 11:08 AM
Bora, thank you for the mention. I thought I should create a list of the best community sites dedicated to physicians and scientists:
http://scienceroll.com/2008/05/24/community-sites-for-scientists-and-physicians-the-list/
Posted by: Berci Mesko | May 24, 2008 4:36 PM
Thank you. I wrote about some of these before.
Posted by: Coturnix | May 24, 2008 4:46 PM
I thought SciLinks was a trademark of the National Science Teachers Association. How confusing.
Posted by: JasonR | May 24, 2008 6:26 PM
If y'all haven't heard about Academia.edu, check it out. It is another social networking site for scientists and the like. Think of it as a specialized Facebook. I remember something similar but the name doesn't ring a bell.
Posted by: Kambiz Kamrani | May 25, 2008 1:47 AM
There is also Laboratree started by Sean Mooney and others at Indiana University. Really nice interface.
Posted by: shwu | May 25, 2008 3:16 AM