Associated Press is going to go extinct, due to being incorrigibly idiotic. In the era of blogs, Creative Commons licences, Open Source, Open Access... they are working actively at stopping traffic to their site!!! How much more stupid can they be? And the way they try to bully everyone around about this, I say...let them have it: never, ever link to their stories again - they are stolen stories to begin with, so take a couple of minutes to find the originals that AP stole from, then link to the original. Let the AP die.
Search
Profile
My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Recent Posts
- Recent Science-Related Events in the Triangle
- The Open Laboratory 2009 - the deadline is looming!
- ScienceOnline2010 - introducing the participants
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- Clock Quotes
- Peer-review - nothing has changed since 1945 (video)
- ScienceOnline2010 - introducing the participants
- New and Exciting in PLoS ONE
- Clock Quotes
- The Amazing Bouncing Pebble Toad (video)
Recent Comments
- JB in NC on Hairless Grey Foxes in North Carolina
- Catharine on Recent Science-Related Events in the Triangle
- Coturnix on Recent Science-Related Events in the Triangle
- Stephanie Z on Recent Science-Related Events in the Triangle
- Arunn on Recent Science-Related Events in the Triangle
- csrster on Peer-review - nothing has changed since 1945 (video)
- DB on Cortisol necessary for circadian rhythm of cell division
- Jim Thomerson on The craziest fish jaws ever (video)
- Jim Thomerson on The craziest fish jaws ever (video)
- Coturnix on The Amazing Bouncing Pebble Toad (video)
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
Find me on...
Make Me Happy
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Make Me Solvent
I Support
Bloggie Stuff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
« ClockQuotes | Main | Darwin Ceiling at the Museum »
AP: Stupid, it hurts!
Category: Media
Posted on: June 14, 2008 12:33 PM, by Coturnix
Find more posts in: 
Technology
Politics
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/74080
Comments
Heh. I've read other stories about this, but yours is the most concise.
Posted by: Matt Platte | June 14, 2008 3:00 PM
See also this. My response to that:
Reaction equals action
or
Reap what you've sown
or
Get a taste of your own medicine
or
Start walking the walk and we'll reconsider.
Posted by: Coturnix | June 14, 2008 3:26 PM
What do you mean, "they are stolen stories to begin with"?
AP has actual reporters. They do original reporting.
Posted by: Michael Burton | June 14, 2008 4:02 PM
Check the links above - they steal from actual journalists and repackage as if they did the reporting themselves. Always did it. They are more like an old-school version of one of those leech blogs that steal blog-posts from others while removing links, URLs, names of blogs, names of bloggers, then get ad revenue from people hitting their site through searches.
Posted by: Coturnix | June 14, 2008 4:06 PM
I really doubt that they are "stealing." They have legal agreements with the other news organizations for sharing the stories amongst themselves. There are probably even payments made for stories that come from local news sources, and local newspapers pay a fee to be able to use the AP stories.
Posted by: Ahcuah | June 14, 2008 6:26 PM
Depends on the type of "morality world" one is in, as Jeff Jarvis mentions in his post. From their perspective, it is all 'legal'. From ours, their laws are illegal, or should be, or at least are painfully outdated.
Posted by: Coturnix | June 14, 2008 6:55 PM
Odd sort of "morality world" you live in in which valid contracts are "illegal". (Basically, the contracts are an early version of a Creative Commons license among members of the media.)
Note carefully that I am not defending their going after folks who are clearly making "fair use" of the AP stories, just that to call such contracts "stealing" is a perversion of the language.
Interestingly, I went to high school with Jeff Jarvis.
Posted by: Ahcuah | June 14, 2008 9:38 PM
Calling the AP's normal collection and retransmission of stories "stealing" is a bizarre use of the word. The process is, as has been pointed out, a well-recognized part of the contract that member newspapers sign on to. You may not like that model of journalism, but it's hardly "stealing." Second, retransmitted stories typically retain the attribution -- for example, one page of the Sunday edition of the paper I work for will contain a story with a byline "so-and-so from the Sierra Vista Herald," and another with a byline "so-and-so from the Arizona Daily Star" -- both accessed through the AP. Third, the AP employs a large number of its own reporters -- so in those cases, there is no "original" to find, because it was the AP's story to begin with. That being said, the suits against Drudge et al sound like they're off their rocker.
Posted by: Stentor | June 15, 2008 12:39 AM
This is faintly reminiscent of TSR's early policy vis a vis the internet. Basically, if you published your home brewed D&D stuff online and used any TSR trademark (e.g., umber hulk) you were at risk of being sued, or more likely booted off your ISP after they received a "bigfoot letter" from TSR's lawyers.
TSR as an independent company didn't long survive the net with that policy.
Posted by: karl | July 9, 2008 3:38 PM