Now on ScienceBlogs: On Scientific Embargoes: What Exactly Would Journalists Investigate? [Mike the Mad Biologist]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Search

Profile

away%20from%20computer.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Evolution: Education and Outreach | Main | Obligatory Reading of the Day: Opening up Scientific Culture »

Blog is software

Category: Blogging
Posted on: July 17, 2008 10:41 PM, by Coturnix

I've said it before and I said it again, and I heard other people say it repeatedly (e.g., Anton): blog is software.

It's up to every individual (or group, or organization, or company, or political entity) to put it to creative use.

Blog is not content. Content is what someone puts on a blog.

Medium is not the message. Though medium affects the message, of course, and content found on blogs is affected by the ease of use, extremely low cost, and frequency of updating, as well as social communication norms that develop over time.

This, this and this are expansions on that theme, mostly. Interesting reads, nonetheless. What do you think?

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/76536

Comments

1

I was having similar thoughts the other day. Think about the term "blogging" (rather than the noun blog, think of the activity). Every now and then someone comes along with a "blogging code" or mentions "blogging ethics" ... I've also seen some conversations where people suddenly decide that bloggERS are journalists. (Which is rather offensive to journalists, I'm sure).

But blogging is like writing, or driving, or a lot of other broadly based activities. The ethics, or codes, don't come from the blogging, but from the other professional or avocational link... maybe just being a person, maybe a scientist, maybe a community liaison, and in some cases, maybe even a journalist.

The blog is software. Blogging is programming.

Posted by: Greg Laden | July 18, 2008 12:07 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM