Less than 100 comments to go. The lucky 10,000th commenter gets a prize - a choice from the Clock Store or perhaps one of the anthologies....
Search
Profile
My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Recent Posts
- New URL for this blog
- New URL/feed for A Blog Around The Clock
- A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Open Laboratory 2010 - submissions so far
- Clock Quotes
- Clock Quotes
- Clock Quotes
- Clock Quotes
- New and Exciting in PLoS this week
- ScienceOnline2010 - interview with Anne Frances Johnson
Recent Comments
- wildanr on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- yogi-one on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Alvaro on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Chris Surridge on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Claudia Koltzenburg on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Joerg Kurt Wegner on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Peter McGrath on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Sandra Porter on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- cfeagans on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Barn Owl on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
Archives
- July 2011
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
Find me on...
Make Me Happy
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Make Me Solvent
I Support
Bloggie Stuff

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
« Atemporal and ahistorical Google Maps? | Main | ClockQuotes »
Comments competition
Category: Housekeeping
Posted on: August 30, 2008 12:38 AM, by Coturnix












Comments
Why are we so obsessed with round numbers? This is ScienceBlogs for goodness sake! Aren't there some numbers that are interesting for more reasons than being one followed by some quantity of zeroes? :-)
Posted by: dean | August 30, 2008 1:11 AM
Surely we've passed the mark now, if there were only 100 to go when you posted that?
Posted by: bill | August 30, 2008 1:58 AM
... or maybe not, since the 10,000th comment will probably be in this thread...
Posted by: bill | August 30, 2008 2:00 AM
Who, me? What? Nothing. I'm not doing anything. Why you lookin' at me like that?
Posted by: bill | August 30, 2008 2:01 AM
So is anyone sitting around posting a hundred comments?
Posted by: Zeno | August 30, 2008 2:20 AM
I still haven't received my prize for completing the sciblog survey!
Posted by: eddie | August 30, 2008 3:55 AM
First post!
Err, no... wait.
Gee, math is hard.
Posted by: Michael Burton | August 30, 2008 11:34 AM
60 to go.
Posted by: Coturnix | August 30, 2008 12:23 PM
Round numbers. Depends on which science. From the point of view of mathematics, all numbers are equal. From the point of view of psychology, round numbers are important - that is why we even have the term 'round numbers'. They are cute and fun and they can be useful markers.
Posted by: Coturnix | August 30, 2008 1:16 PM
Wouldn't it be funny if your 10,000th comment was also the one millionths' comment on Sb. And the one Zillionth comment on the entire internet? (There is a prize for that, yes?)
Posted by: Greg Laden | September 2, 2008 11:04 AM
Next one? Me :) Each comment increases the chance of getting the prize, isn't it?
Posted by: Pawel | September 2, 2008 12:09 PM