Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Research Blogging Awards 2010


Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Quail Ridge Books

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Wildlife of Serbia | Main | So, how are evangelicals and fundamentalists responding to Palin? »

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to be nationalized

Category: Politics
Posted on: September 6, 2008 9:06 PM, by Coturnix

Control of industry by government? I though these guys were against socialism.

Ed Cone:

I've been thinking about a newspaper column on "socialism." I put the word in quotes, because the subject is bogeyman scare-word "socialism," applied to any government program or tax policy opposed by the epitheteer, not the actual, government-control-of-industries definition.

Chris Bowers:

The problem I have is with the incredible cognitive dissonance surrounding "big government" in our national political discourse. Even as we have reached national consensus on nationalizing industries, which is the literal definition of socialism and big government, politicians of every party keep talking about "small government" as though it were a virtue. I mean, the day after the Republican convention, which included countless attacks on big government, the Republican administration goes out an nationalizes a major industry. It will probably be done in the corporate welfare style typical of American government--privatize the profits, socialize the risk--but it is still nationalization.

Related: I Want Bigger Government!

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

I recall that when our own glorious leader nationalised Northern Rock (a crime for which our grand-childreo's children will still be paying), they went to extraordinary lengths to avoid using the 'n'-word.
And you're correct: They only nationalised the losses.

Posted by: eddie | September 7, 2008 10:27 AM

2

I don't understand that at all really. I have no real objection to nationalising companies (provided they're paid for rather than just seized) as it's not as private companies ever do a spectacular job of anything beyond lining exec and major shareholder pockets.

But to "part-nationalise" whilst outsourcing the profits to random contractors just seems lunacy of the highest order. Either take the company over or don't, don't prat about in some sort of half way house where they get paid and you foot the bill.

I'm not surprised at how "socialism" is a dirty word in the US though. This is afterall the same country whose politicians constantly preach to the rest of the world about freedom whilst cursing those damnable liberals.

Posted by: Andrew | September 8, 2008 6:49 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.