Now on ScienceBlogs: Another contender for the worst reporting ever: "Coma man"

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Today's carnivals | Main | Art History bloggers? »

Obama answers science questions

Category: Politics
Posted on: September 1, 2008 11:59 PM, by Coturnix

General election is in two months. Both campaigns are in a frenzy. Media is covering it full speed. Even low-information voters are slowly starting to pay attention. At this point, every word every candidate says is analyzed and over-analyzed and can potentially be disastrous if the opposing side spins it in their TV ads. This is not the time to venture into unnecessary topics. Caution is the key.

Nobody who cherishes reason, logic, empiricism and rationality is crazy to vote for the train wreck that is the McCain/Palin ticket. Such people are going to vote for Obama even if they think he is too conservative, or too liberal, or whatever. There is no reason for Obama to spend any time and risk in order to woo such voters.

Yet, he did. He answered the 14 science questions facing America, posed by the ScienceDebate 2008 group. Just the act of doing this shows he is serious about this and understands the importance of science and technology in every policy decision.

As for the answers, some are better than others. He is obviously well informed and understands the broader issues well. Some of the answers are a little vague - but that is to be expected at this point in the debate: each detail will be treated as a "campaign promise" so he has to thread cautiously. If anything, I am impressed how MUCH detail he provided.

For specifics, I agree with criticisms of individual questions written by Revere and Nick. I would also add that I hoped to see more about the way agriculture fits into the Energy policy, i.e., how it can be reformed so as not to be the biggest consumer of oil in the US economy as it is now.

Also see this discussion.

But in general, I am happy. I am looking forward to McCain's promised answers (and how much they are at odds with Palin's known stances as well McCain's own previous responses). Finally, if/when Obama becomes a President, I would like him to do this exercise again - not having an election at stake and knowing he is in charge, perhaps he can provide more detail on his policies as well as mechanisms he'll use to procure funding and to persuade the Congress and the people to let him follow through on these.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Wow. he answered them and showed that he thinks about these issues.

I guess McCain's responses was "What the---???"

Oh, well, I can already see McSame's response:

Q1. I'm more qualified to deal with these issues because I was a POW.

Questions 2 - 15: See Q1.

Anyway, he doesn't know much about science because he was 894th out of 899 in his graduating class.

Doesn't that make you like him more?

Posted by: yogi-one | September 2, 2008 6:13 AM

2

he was 894th out of 899 in his graduating class

So five of of his graduating class were even greater mavericks than McCain himself.

Posted by: cfrost | September 5, 2008 2:27 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM