Sure, she would attack Russia, but at least she is not aware that she can do it pre-emptively.
But that's OK. She'll learn at the foot of the master.
Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine
My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

« Today's carnivals | Main | New and Exciting in PLoS ONE »
Category: Politics
Posted on: September 11, 2008 9:27 PM, by Coturnix
Sure, she would attack Russia, but at least she is not aware that she can do it pre-emptively.
But that's OK. She'll learn at the foot of the master.
casaubon's book 02.13.2012
denialism blog 02.13.2012
respectful insolence 02.13.2012
evolutionblog 02.12.2012
starts with a bang! 02.11.2012
Comments
I think you're too paranoid. The US and Russia together only have 9600 deliverable nuclear weapons.
Posted by: llewelly | September 12, 2008 9:44 AM
Only!
Posted by: Coturnix | September 12, 2008 9:48 AM