Now on ScienceBlogs: That Which I Sowed in Tears, I Now Reap in Joy: A Love Letter to my Beautiful Readers

Seed Media Group

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« New and Exciting in PLoS ONE | Main | Yet another political roundup »

Natalie Portman for Early Vote (video)

Category: Politics
Posted on: October 22, 2008 6:23 PM, by Coturnix

...and Natalie Portman Wants You to Have "The Talk":

In a sense, this is also one of the videos of scientists endorsing Obama.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Did Natalie Portman do the Great Schlep?

Posted by: pough | October 22, 2008 6:55 PM

2

Eh, not as impressive as Danica McKellar who has finite Erdos-Bacon number. (Also, not to be too off-topic by why in 2007 is anyone still using covering toys as a way of testing object permanence? Hasn't it been well-established that their are too many confounding factors such as motor control issues? (I haven't looked at the study they did so maybe they justify it somehow)).

Posted by: Joshua Zelinsky | October 22, 2008 7:09 PM

3

I want to have "the talk" with Natalie too, sigh

Posted by: Draconiz | October 22, 2008 7:12 PM

4

Eh, not as impressive as Danica McKellar who has finite Erdos-Bacon number.

Not so fast, Joshua: Ms. Portman also has a finite Erdős-Bacon number!

James F, with an Erdős number of 4.

Posted by: James F | October 22, 2008 8:08 PM

5

yes yes... I do think this "talk" is a non-Jew schlep! WOOT!

Posted by: Mimi | October 23, 2008 3:35 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM