That is the Discover Magazine's series of articles, which includes:
The 10 Most Influential People in Science
Teen Genius: 5 Promising Scientists Under 20
...and more (the series, as the numbers above do not add up to 50, must still be in progress).
Search
Profile
My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Recent Posts
- Clock Quotes
- Tweetlinks, 11-09-09
- ScienceOnline'09 - interview with Christian Casper
- ScienceOnline2010 - introducing the participants
- Clock Quotes
- Tweetlinks, 11-08-09
- The podcast of the radio show is now online
- ScienceOnline2010 - Program highlights
- Clock Quotes
- Tweetlinks, 11-07-09
Recent Comments
- Darren Naish on ScienceOnline'09 - interview with Christian Casper
- Christian Casper on ScienceOnline'09 - interview with Christian Casper
- Catharine on Tweetlinks, 11-08-09
- LuLu on BIO101 - Lecture 7 - Physiology: Coordinated Response
- Coturnix on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- JohnV on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- Coturnix on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- JohnV on Cool new Scienceblogs.com widgets
- Occam Razor on Will there be terrorist attacks if Obama is the President?
- DeLene on Science Cafe Raleigh: Boom 'n' Doom: Volcanoes, North Carolina and North Carolina Volcanoes
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
Find me on...
Make Me Happy
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Make Me Solvent
I Support
Bloggie Stuff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
« Ten things to know if you're having Thanksgiving with Republicans | Main | ...the girl on a half-shell... »
The 50 Most Important, Influential, and Promising People in Science
Category: Academia
Posted on: November 26, 2008 8:49 PM, by Coturnix
Find more posts in: 
Education & Careers
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
Comments
For the sake of balance, it would be useful to have a follow-up in a decade of how well the under 20 geniuses, and the under-40 geniuses have done.
For that matter, I'd love to see (modulo the laws of defamation) a list of the 50 most over-rated people in science.
It would be easy to start with highly touted discoveries which turned out to be nondiscoveries. Lysenko. N-rays. Polywater. Eugenics. Geocentrism. CIA psionics experiments. Young Earth and New Age crackpots. Creationists. Intelligent Design liars (especially those who, for instance, teach at a Medical School). Ruth B. Drown, who sold fake radio-based cancer cures to desperate, dying people for decades. George W. Bush's political hacks who censor NASA and EPA reports... he's appointing more such creatures this very week.
What do you think of this proposal?
Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | November 26, 2008 9:08 PM
Oh, that would be tough to pull off - lots of insulted people, lawsuits flying ;-)
But most of your examples are not over-rated scientists, but various pseudoscientists, non-scientists, anti-scientists, denialists, cranks, quacks and moral-less politicians.
Posted by: Coturnix | November 26, 2008 9:20 PM
They spelled my name wrong.
It's "Cuttlefish", with a C
And an "uttlefish".
Posted by: Cuttlefish | November 26, 2008 9:45 PM
Nicole King is the only person I know on the list (in that oblique grad-school way), and I must say it's a well-deserved honor. She was also named a MacArthur Fellow in '05.
Posted by: James F | November 27, 2008 12:10 AM
Hands up anyone who seriously thinks that every one of the 10 most influential people in science and 20 best brains under 40 are all in the US. Anyone?
I can't see any disclaimer about these just being Americans, so isn't Discover just being racist?
Posted by: Bob O'H | November 27, 2008 1:14 AM
Hands up anyone who seriously thinks that every one of the 10 most influential people in science and 20 best brains under 40 are all in the US. Anyone?
I can't see any disclaimer about these just being Americans, so isn't Discover just being racist?
Posted by: Bob O'H | November 27, 2008 1:16 AM
Oops. sorry for the double post.
If I post it again, does it automatically become true?
Posted by: Bob O'H | November 27, 2008 1:19 AM
Yes, I noticed that too, Bob. They mention "American science" in the intro to the 50 people, but then their Lifetime Achievers includes Stephen Hawking who's always worked in the UK.
Posted by: MissPrism | November 27, 2008 7:21 AM
I have met Harold Varmus and Ed Boyden from the lists. I also noticed that the lists are restricted to the Anglo-American sphere. Bob - thanks for that link: I was looking for it myself for another post that is brewing in my head.
Posted by: Coturnix | November 27, 2008 11:06 AM
Re: MissPrism and Coturnix:
"Stephen Hawking who's always worked in the UK" and "Anglo-American" -- except for his regular stays at Caltech, in Pasadena, California, as guest of Prof. Kip Thorne, and his new appointment to the position of Perimeter Institute Distinguished Research Chair.
"In announcing that Prof. Hawking will visit PI for extended periods each year [beginning summer 2009], PI Director Neil Turok said, 'The appointment marks a new phase in our recruitment that will see leading scientists from around the world establish a second 'research home' at Perimeter Institute. I am delighted that Stephen has agreed to accept the first of a projected 40 such visiting Chairs. We look forward to hosting Stephen in Waterloo, Ontario, to benefiting from his wise mentorship and guidance which has been so successful in Cambridge, and to the many stimulating scientific collaborations which will undoubtedly emerge.'"
I'm also wondering if:
(a) Discover made an intentional editorial decision to restrict themselves to USA/UK/Canada, perhaps as a part of the "American Triumphalism" glaringly obvious in the likes of George W. Bush and Sarah Palin;
(b) they are preparing a follow-up article on "The 10 Most Influential People outside the Angloamerican hegemony in Science";
(c) The skinflint editors wanted to save money on reimbursable phonecalls and snailmails beyond our parochial borders?
If the next Isaac Newton lived in New Zealand or Africa, would we ever hear about it in the USA?
Posted by: Jonathan Vos Post | November 28, 2008 2:59 PM