Last week, Terry Gross interviewed William Ayers on Fresh Air on NPR - you can listen to the podcast here.
James Fallows and Dave Winer have completely opposite reactions to the interview. What do you think?
Search
Profile
My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com
Buy the 2009 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:
Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:
Recent Posts
- New URL for this blog
- New URL/feed for A Blog Around The Clock
- A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Open Laboratory 2010 - submissions so far
- Clock Quotes
- Clock Quotes
- Clock Quotes
- Clock Quotes
- New and Exciting in PLoS this week
- ScienceOnline2010 - interview with Anne Frances Johnson
Recent Comments
- wildanr on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- yogi-one on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Alvaro on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Chris Surridge on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Claudia Koltzenburg on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Joerg Kurt Wegner on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Peter McGrath on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Sandra Porter on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- cfeagans on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
- Barn Owl on A Farewell to Scienceblogs: the Changing Science Blogging Ecosystem
Archives
- July 2011
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
Find me on...
Make Me Happy
Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!
Make Me Solvent
I Support
Bloggie Stuff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
« The Open Laboratory 2008 - in the final of all final stretches! | Main | How rumors spread.... »
The Ayers interview
Category: Media • Politics
Posted on: November 22, 2008 7:40 PM, by Coturnix
Find more posts in: 
Politics
Politics
Comments
Update by Dave Winer with which I agree.
Posted by: Coturnix | November 22, 2008 11:34 PM
Actually they're not completely opposite. Fallows says she did a very competent interview, and I don't disagree with that. The problem is that she prosecuted the Republican case against Ayers and Obama, which was an unfair. Read my follow-up today for more.
Posted by: Dave Winer | November 22, 2008 11:37 PM
Once I read your update, I realized that. I agree. I especially agree with your update 100%.
Posted by: Coturnix | November 22, 2008 11:40 PM
ayers made some decent points, but he's much too fond of the "i'll only take responsibility for my actions if everyone else does, too" game. he's a smart fellow, but still none too eager to make any decisive statements on his participation with the WU. would he, i wonder, admit to practicing "terrorism" if (despite his good intentions, of course! :p) one of their bombs HAD crippled or killed someone? he put lives in danger with his actions, casualties or no casualties. and he seemed to forget that the interview was about him and not john mcCain (who surely has his own conscience to wrestle with).
gross did a decent job. with a figure as polarizing as ayers, is she not supposed to try to actually pin him down on anything? should she stay away from pointed questions altogether (which winer seemed to have a problem with)?
so i'm obviously more with fallows than winer on this. however, i did think the wrap-up was kind of silly. ayers had been evasive about the issue of 'coming clean' with the public over the WU bombing campaign throughout the interview. did she then expect him to suddenly 'fess up? rather lame, imo; and so i think winer had a point there.
my take.
Posted by: brooks | November 22, 2008 11:48 PM
mr. winer:
re: your update-- well said.
Posted by: brooks | November 22, 2008 11:52 PM