Now on ScienceBlogs: Rhodes Secretary: Wall Street Megabonuses Draining Our Young Talent

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

profilepic9-09a.jpg

My scientific specialty is chronobiology (circadian rhythms and photoperiodism), with additional interests in comparative physiology, animal behavior and evolution. I am not an MD so I cannot diagnose and treat your sleep problems. As well as writing this blog, I am also the Online Discussion Expert for PLoS. This is a personal blog and opinions within it in no way reflect the policies of PLoS. You can contact me at: Coturnix@gmail.com


Buy the 2008 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2007 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Buy the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology:

The Open Laboratory

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Find me on...


Homepage

FriendFeed

Twitter

Facebook

Nature Network

YouTube

Flickr

Dopplr

Stumbleupon

LinkedIn

Make Me Happy

Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

Add Scienceblogs to your Technorati Favorites!

Make Me Solvent

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

A Blog Around The Clock swag store

I Support

Carrboro Coworking

Project Exploration

Project Exploration

Bloggie Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

« Hotspots, a new PBS movie | Main | More (and better?) science on TV? »

New journal: Ideas in Ecology and Evolution

Category: EcologyEvolutionOpen Science
Posted on: December 12, 2008 4:58 PM, by Coturnix

Ideas in Ecology and Evolution is a new Open Access journals which is also experimenting with the review process.

Bob O'Hara and commenters go into details. I hope it does not end like Medical Hypotheses: a great source of blog-fodder for snarky bloggers and not much else. We'll keep an eye....

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

I am the editor of Medical Hypotheses - Hi!

I agree that the journal does seem intensely to irritate a certain kind of science blogger - some of whom have apparently had their sense of humor excised along with any scientific adventurousness thay may once have possessed ;=)

However, the Thomson ISI Impact Factor of 1.3 and c. 45000 article downloads per month are objective evidence that Medical Hypotheses also plays a significant scientific function.

Peer review is neither necessray nor sufficient for science, and not all journals should be peer reviewed. There is space for a diversity of editorial evaluation processes, surely?

Live and let live...

Posted by: Bruce G Charlton | December 13, 2008 9:22 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM