Now on ScienceBlogs: "Investigative science journalism" and books I like to read [All of My Faults Are Stress Related]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Cognitive Daily

A new cognitive psychology article nearly every day

Profile

Dave and Greta Munger Cognitive Daily reports nearly every day on fascinating peer-reviewed developments in cognition from the most respected scientists in the field.

Greta Munger is Professor of Psychology at Davidson College whose works include The History of Psychology: Fundamental Questions. Dave Munger is co-founder and president of ResearchBlogging.org and a writer whose works include Researching Online. And yes, he is married to Greta.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Search

Categories

Archives

Blogs

Other links

Participate in research

Other Information

« Last chance on the Blogger SAT Challenge | Main | The music we like: Does expertise make a difference? (Part 2) »

Bloggasm survey of diversity in the blogosphere

Category: News
Posted on: September 20, 2006 6:34 AM, by Dave Munger

Simon Owens has posted the results of his survey of diversity in the blogosphere at his site Bloggasm.

Here are the results for the blogosphere as a whole:

Male: 69%
Female: 31%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 73%
Black/African: 9%
Asian: 10%
Middle Eastern/Arab: 1%
Latino/Hispanic: 6%
Native American: 1%

This seems about right to me, based on anecdotal experience. Simon also broke down his results by niche. Here are the findings for science blogs (which presumably includes CogDaily's response):

Male: 71%
Female: 29%
***
White/Caucasian/European: 88%
Black/African: 6%
Asian: 6%

One thing I find interesting about this result is the low number of Asians who science blog -- lower even than the blogosphere as a whole. It's possible that the sample size of science blogs was too small to get a reliable result, but I'd have to say that my personal experience bears this out as well. We know there are lots of Asian scientists; where are the Asian science bloggers?

Also, it appears from Simon's sample that women are over-represented among science bloggers: 29 percent, compared to "about one fifth" of the science workforce, according to the recent NAS report.

I do have some questions about Simon's methodology: how were the 1,000 blogs for the study selected? Clearly he didn't just select the Technorati top 1,000 -- we wouldn't have made the cut then. Was an effort made to capture the "long tail" of the blogosphere -- those millions of less popular blogs that make up the vast majority of blogs overall? And what was the response rate? Is it possible that diversity was over- or under-represented because of this?

That said, the study is an impressive accomplishment, certainly the most thorough accounting of diversity of blogosphere that I've seen. I'd add only one point, which I made in my survey response as well: the sheer size of the blogosphere allows anyone to have a diverse experience, whether or not this experience reflects the diversity of the blogosphere as a whole. Even if there are relatively few women science bloggers, I can choose to read proportionately more of them. My experience of the blogosphere doesn't have to be the same as the blogosphere's actual composition.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM