A new cognitive psychology article nearly every day
Cognitive Daily reports nearly every day on fascinating peer-reviewed developments in cognition from the most respected scientists in the field.
Greta Munger is Professor of Psychology at Davidson College whose works include The History of Psychology: Fundamental Questions. Dave Munger is co-founder and president of ResearchBlogging.org and a writer whose works include Researching Online. And yes, he is married to Greta.
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« How can something like this happen? | Main | ScienceBloggers talk about Virginia Tech »
Category: Fun and games
Posted on: April 17, 2007 8:21 AM, by Dave Munger
Tired of depressing news? Take a break and look at some optical illusions!
Q: How many spirals are in this picture?
A: None
For more, visit Michael Bach's illusion page.
Akiyoshi's got a new one:
For more, visit Akiyoshi's illusion pages.
YES! Send me a free issue of Seed.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.
(Non-U.S. subscribers, click here.)
Comments
http://snarkmarket.com/blog/snarkives/optical-illusion.gif
Both central circles are of the same size :)
Posted by: pelf | April 17, 2007 10:37 AM
Yes, the IMAGES of the bulls are the same size, but if this painting is supposed to represent a real scene than the brown bull is bigger. Just like the images of the bricks in the walls are different sizes due to perspective, but the real bricks would be the same size.
Posted by: OsakaGuy | April 17, 2007 1:30 PM
Good point, OsakaGuy.
Usually in that illusion the image is more abstract, and the converging lines don't necessarily represent perspective. I just thought this was an amusing version.
Posted by: Dave Munger | April 17, 2007 1:32 PM
http://web.mit.edu/persci/people/adelson/checkershadow_illusion.html
Thisi s my favorite illusion. The Two squares are the same color.
Posted by: Tiago Serafim | April 17, 2007 1:58 PM
I thought I'd seen every optical illusion, until I found this one:
http://www.cheswick.com/ches/me/
The effect is similar to any after-image illusion, but it lasts for hours, in many cases more than a full day.
Posted by: Jay | April 17, 2007 3:39 PM
For those not knowing images of M.C. Escher:
http://images.google.com/images?q=escher
Posted by: Dramenbnejs | April 17, 2007 4:16 PM
This one that flew the internets last year is my favourite:
http://www.johnsadowski.com/2006/05/lil-color-illusion.html
There were many of them around and they are easily made apaprently.
Posted by: Marco Romeny | April 17, 2007 5:01 PM
I am still looking for info on an illusion of movement called the "ghost coin." Just rub two coins together, up and down, with the index finger of each hand. You will see a third coin appearing between and below the two moving coins. I assume it is due to retention of the visual image, but I have not found any formal work on this and also have not figured out why the third illusory coin always appears below the other two.
Posted by: Gary | April 18, 2007 9:26 PM
Actually what is illusiory here is the claim that Bovril is always the same. It used to be made from beef extract, and was heavily marketed as such (hence the bulls). Now it is completely vegetarian. (It tastes the same to me though, although one wonders how good our gustatory memory really is.)
Posted by: Nigel J.T. Thomas | April 19, 2007 3:25 AM
Very fun! I will put your link in my next post!
Posted by: Serena | April 19, 2007 4:06 AM
Haven't seen enough illusions?
The moire's the merrier, I say.
Posted by: MT | April 20, 2007 12:48 AM
The Akiyoshi one is fascinating. Also because when I unfocus my eyes even slightly, the illusion completely disappears.
Posted by: agoodspellr | April 20, 2007 12:59 AM
Curious - can someone with poorer eyesight examine the Akiyoshi illusion and comment on whether or not it works with and without glasses. (I have better than normal vision.)
Posted by: agoodspellr | April 20, 2007 1:01 AM
Agoodspellr,
I am somewhat nearsighted (enough to have a restriction on my license and to think the font styles on this site is too tiny at night). And I also have never been able to do stereograms. So I am a mild example of your question and it does work both with and without glasses. It didn't work at all the first time I looked at it, but now I can't look at it at all without seeing them float.
Also followed the link to his other illusions and I felt that the roller I'm focused on moves faster. This may be similar to what you report. I'm thinking the rollers might be an interesting image to play with on our eye tracker screen but have not thought of a way to record the *perceived* motion. (Maybe talk-aloud with a facilitator trying to record, or maybe three different keys--could even use a mild deception and tell a naive participant it's a reflex game. So now I'm trying to remember if ClearView records keystrokes.)
Posted by: Mitch | April 21, 2007 10:59 AM
There seems to be a stray quote at the end of the URL for SandLot Science. (It's encoded as %22.)
The correct URL is:
http://www.sandlotscience.com/Illusion_Jump_Main/Master_Jump.htm
Posted by: Michael Burton | April 24, 2007 5:24 PM
Thanks, Michael. It's fixed now.
Posted by: Dave Munger | April 25, 2007 6:14 AM