Several newspapers reported on the Administration's use of information
from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication
(SWIFT) to track financial transactions. The reported intent
is to track terrorist financing.
President Bush and Vice-President Cheney issued condemnations (NYT, WaPo). Representative Peter King called for prosecution of the newspersons involved in the report.
The Administration protested the reports, because, in the words of President Bush:
There is no evidence of harm, nor is there a plausible explanation for how this harm would come about. It rings false, because it is already common knowledge that the Administration tracks financial information. In fact, if the Administration is to be believed, they have already seized something like two hundred million dollars in suspected terrorist funds. There's even a book about it.
All the newspapers did, was to reveal some additional details. Most of their disclosure pertained to the question of whether the program is legal.
Personally, I don't think that al-Qaeda (or any other terrorist organization) cares if the program is legal. They are not exactly constitutional scholars. Furthermore, I should think that if millions of dollars have already been seized, the fact that the money is now gone just might have tipped them off to the existence of the program.
Which is the better clue: someone took millions of dollars out of their bank account, or someone published a story in a newspaper? I don't know about you, but the disappearance of millions of dollars from my bank account probably would be the thing I would notice first.
BTW, the title of the post comes from a post on Booman Tribune, which is more thorough than this one. So maybe others have covered this more comprehensively that I did, but I feel better now for having posted this.
President Bush and Vice-President Cheney issued condemnations (NYT, WaPo). Representative Peter King called for prosecution of the newspersons involved in the report.
The Administration protested the reports, because, in the words of President Bush:
And the disclosure of this program is disgraceful. We're at war with a bunch of people who want to hurt the United States of America, and for people to leak that program and for a newspaper to publish it does great harm to the United States of America.
There is no evidence of harm, nor is there a plausible explanation for how this harm would come about. It rings false, because it is already common knowledge that the Administration tracks financial information. In fact, if the Administration is to be believed, they have already seized something like two hundred million dollars in suspected terrorist funds. There's even a book about it.
All the newspapers did, was to reveal some additional details. Most of their disclosure pertained to the question of whether the program is legal.
Personally, I don't think that al-Qaeda (or any other terrorist organization) cares if the program is legal. They are not exactly constitutional scholars. Furthermore, I should think that if millions of dollars have already been seized, the fact that the money is now gone just might have tipped them off to the existence of the program.
Which is the better clue: someone took millions of dollars out of their bank account, or someone published a story in a newspaper? I don't know about you, but the disappearance of millions of dollars from my bank account probably would be the thing I would notice first.
BTW, the title of the post comes from a post on Booman Tribune, which is more thorough than this one. So maybe others have covered this more comprehensively that I did, but I feel better now for having posted this.
Comments
Thanks for making it so easy to get into your blog. Mom
Posted by: Dolly | June 27, 2006 9:30 PM