The Corpus Callosum
The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.
Search
Profile
Corpus Callosum is written by a psychiatrist at a small community hospital somewhere in the USA. Email to cc.scienceblogger at gmail dot com.
Banner images from CNS Forums. Banner font: Ringbearer.
Feedburner Feed
Quick Add-Feed Links...

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Recent Posts
- Peak Psychology
- Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Update on Nav1.7
- Serious Mandate for National Health
- Progress in Clean Energy: Oil from Algae
- AMA Slides Into Irrelevancy
- Possible Genetic Link: Insomnia and Depression
- Latest Hedge Fund Strategy
- New Kind of Cloud
- Miscellaneous Financial Link
Recent Comments
- Top Google on Bad Science at the Pentagon
- michael on Possible Genetic Link: Insomnia and Depression
- Finn on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- gzuckier on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Bob on New Kind of Cloud
- Bob on New Kind of Cloud
- Roland Branconnier on Peak Psychology
- Bardiac on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Diggitt on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Bayesian Bouffant, FCD on Baubike: Adventures in Design
Categories
- Academia
- Antidepressants
- Armchair Musings
- Basic Concepts
- Bioethics
- CME
- Chatter
- Computing
- Energy
- Environment
- Humor
- Medicine
- Meta
- Neuroscience
- Personal
- Photos of Interest
- Politics
- Propaganda
- Psychiatry
- Public Health
- Science News
- Science in the Media
- Social Commentary
- Social Issues
- Uncategorizable
- economy
Archives
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
The main blogroll has been moved to its own page, so as not to delay the opening of the main page.
Carnivals

Other Stuff
« Appropriate Taxes | Main | Shrinky-Dink Tech »
The Three Laws of Musicodynamics
Category: Armchair Musings
Posted on: November 27, 2007 9:44 PM, by Joseph j7uy5
All the good music already exists. It does not matter how many hours you spend at the keyboard trying to come up with something new. All of your efforts are in vain.
2. The degree of disorganization in music increases to a maximum.
From now on, all music will be increasingly cacophonous. Any new musical instrument that is created will be even more frightening, unsettling, and disgusting than all preceding instruments.
3. As the tempo of music approaches absolute zero, the entropy of the audience approaches a constant...
...a constant series of coughs, sneezes, shoulder tappings, murmurings, and other general unpleasantness. No interlude shall go unspoiled.
Find more posts in:
Physical Science
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/56733

Comments
1) as of when do you consider this true? Was it true for Thelonius Monk? For Art Tatum?
For Jelly Roll Morton? ... For J. S. Bach? Or maybe just last year?
2) The Moog was built on sine waves. It was preceded (greatly) by ...say... bagpipes. Would you like to reconsider?
3) *looks to the left* Psychiatrist? Ok... never mind. Tempo approaches absolute zero? Did music beat you up as a child?
Posted by: Anon | November 27, 2007 10:58 PM
The thing about music is, there is so much of it. If Sturgeon's Law applies to music (and I so no reason why it doesn't), and 95% of it is crud, there is still more good music than you will ever be able to process in your lifetime.
The average person's conception of what constitutes the complete range of "music" is only a tiny slice of what's out there. Most folks are unforgivably parochial when they speak of music. People have been making rich, complex, fully realized music for at least 80,000 years. More good music has been lost into the ether than all the world's libraries could ever hold. There were singers and composers walking across the Bering land bridge who could make you cry.
I have dedicated thirty years of my life to an infinitesimally tiny slice of music (early 20th century American popular music, mostly), and not a week goes by that I don't hear or read a song I've never heard before, and say to myself, "Damn, there is so much good music, and I'll never be able to learn it all."
And I'm a trained, discriminating listener, who finds 95% of what I hear unforgivably boring, drab, dull, and awful. Consider: I have absolutely no use for rock music -- no offense to those who do. And yet, I know that there are more subgenres of Death Metal alone than the average headbanger can begin to deal with.
I haven't even begun to expose myself to the Edo-period shamisen repertoire, or Australian clapping-stick music, or Beijing opera, or Carnatic music, or Fado, or Hi-Life, or Soviet film music, or Choctaw round-dance music, or the music of 19th c. Buenos Aires salons, or ....
Posted by: HP | November 28, 2007 12:22 AM
Elliott Carter is still writing so #1 cannot be true
Posted by: bwv | November 28, 2007 7:01 AM
Oh OK, I'll bite just to keep you happy.
1. Who decides if it's good or not? You, perhaps? What culture/prejudice/historical era are they/you in? If a time machine had brought back recordings of Stravinsky for Mozart to hear, would he have unequivically declared it 'good', 'bad' or the work of a madman?
2. This may have been true in the 50s and 60s classical scene but it's definitely not true today.
3. Doesn't this all depend on how "good" the audience perceives the music to be? Alcohol seems to play a significant role too.
Good wind-up though.
Posted by: Jonathan | November 29, 2007 5:47 PM
thanks
Posted by: soguk hava deposu | April 16, 2008 11:53 AM