Now on ScienceBlogs: "Investigative science journalism" and books I like to read [All of My Faults Are Stress Related]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

The Corpus Callosum

The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.

Search

Profile

cc-head-41px.jpg


Corpus Callosum is written by a psychiatrist at a small community hospital somewhere in the USA. Email to cc.scienceblogger at gmail dot com.


Banner images from CNS Forums. Banner font: Ringbearer.
Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences


Subscribe with Bloglines
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Feedburner Feed


Quick Add-Feed Links...

add to My YahooSubscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add to My AOL
Add to PageflakesAdd to Netvibes
 Add to GoogleSubscribe in Rojo


Widgetize!
Change Congress



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll


The main blogroll has been moved to its own page, so as not to delay the opening of the main page.

Carnivals



synapsebutton.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg

Evilutionists!

tbbadge.gif

Skeptics Circle

Other Stuff



blog counter

« Brain MRI Animation | Main | Friday Cat Blogging »

Bioethics at Starbucks

Category: Humor
Posted on: December 21, 2007 9:45 AM, by Joseph j7uy5

My colleagues, et alia, have been writing (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10) about the ethical issues involved in the use of drugs to enhance cognition.  This is all based upon an article in Nature, by Barbara Sahakian and Sharon Morein-Zamir: Professor's Little Helper.  Inevitably, the comparison to caffeine comes up.  


The idea is that is the use of caffeine is ethically permissible, then the use of synthetic drugs for the same purpose must be OK, too.  

Note, however, that not everyone agrees that caffeine is OK.  Mormons, in particular, eschew caffeine, because they think it is wrong to ingest it.

Now, I'm not an expert on Mormon theology, so I could be wrong about that.  But I think I am correct.  The reason is this: when I was a kid, I attended a birthday party for someone who was in a Mormon family.  The grown-ups made homemade root beer for the occasion.  They explained that, by making it themselves, they could be sure that there was no caffeine in it.

The root beer, by the way, was very good.


Much later, I was mildly amused to learn that homemade root beer contains a small amount of alcohol.  

Anyway, it is quite likely that the small amount of alcohol was too small to have any discernible effect.  Perhaps it is ethical if you drink just a little bit.

That got me to thinking: if the quantity is relevant to the ethical calculus, is there some point at which a very large quantity of caffeine becomes unethical?

Notice the picture at the top of this post.  That is a picture of a gentleman who tried to find out.  He had gotten a coupon for a free drink at .  He decided to find out what the most expensive drink is.  This is not a trivial task, because the various options can be combined in a variety of ways.  

Eventually, he settled on what he thinks is the most expensive Starbucks concoction: A 13-shot venti soy hazelnut vanilla cinnamon white mocha with extra white mocha and caramel. It cost a total of $13.76 (with tax).



Read about his experience here.  He challenges anyone to find a more expensive Starbucks drink.

Comments

1

That got me to thinking: if the quantity is relevant to the ethical calculus, is there some point at which a very large quantity of caffeine becomes unethical?

A buzz has started on the science blogs around the world about the ethics of cognition enhancing drugs. I have seen the same baseline as you where caffeine is considered OK, but you do bring up an interesting point! I think it is just the start of a long lived, in depth debate not only being qualitative but now also quantitative! Happy Holiday!
Dave Briggs :~)

Posted by: Dave Briggs | December 21, 2007 10:23 AM

2

Mmmmmmm.... Root Beer! :)

And do you know the best thing about yummy root beer?

It is real.

Posted by: Gingerbaker | December 21, 2007 1:49 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM