The Corpus Callosum
The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.
Search
Profile
Corpus Callosum is written by a psychiatrist at a small community hospital somewhere in the USA. Email to cc.scienceblogger at gmail dot com.
Banner images from CNS Forums. Banner font: Ringbearer.
Feedburner Feed
Quick Add-Feed Links...

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Recent Posts
- Peak Psychology
- Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Update on Nav1.7
- Serious Mandate for National Health
- Progress in Clean Energy: Oil from Algae
- AMA Slides Into Irrelevancy
- Possible Genetic Link: Insomnia and Depression
- Latest Hedge Fund Strategy
- New Kind of Cloud
- Miscellaneous Financial Link
Recent Comments
- Top Google on Bad Science at the Pentagon
- michael on Possible Genetic Link: Insomnia and Depression
- Finn on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- gzuckier on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Bob on New Kind of Cloud
- Bob on New Kind of Cloud
- Roland Branconnier on Peak Psychology
- Bardiac on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Diggitt on Baubike: Adventures in Design
- Bayesian Bouffant, FCD on Baubike: Adventures in Design
Categories
- Academia
- Antidepressants
- Armchair Musings
- Basic Concepts
- Bioethics
- CME
- Chatter
- Computing
- Energy
- Environment
- Humor
- Medicine
- Meta
- Neuroscience
- Personal
- Photos of Interest
- Politics
- Propaganda
- Psychiatry
- Public Health
- Science News
- Science in the Media
- Social Commentary
- Social Issues
- Uncategorizable
- economy
Archives
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
The main blogroll has been moved to its own page, so as not to delay the opening of the main page.
Carnivals

Other Stuff
« No Suicide Cringe | Main | Best Photo "Contest" Ever »
Neuromarketing Research: Wine and Price
Category: Neuroscience
Posted on: January 27, 2008 8:41 AM, by Joseph j7uy5
The research is part of the growing body of work that pertains to the study of neural effects of marketing: neuromarketing. Of course, marketing is conducted in order to change behavior. Behavior is changed by perceptions, which are mediated by the brain. So it makes sense to study the effect that marketing has on the brain.
I did not get around to writing a post on the topic. In the meantime, Jonah Lehrer wrote about it on The Frontal Cortex. Read his post before finishing this one. He has the links, and a good explanation of what the study was about and what it means.
OK, you're back.
I have just a couple of things to add. First of all, the study referred to something they called "experienced utility." I guess they are referring to the value that a person thinks they got from a purchase. They also refer to "subjective reports of flavor pleasantness." This phrase denotes the person's sensory experience, which, with respect to wine, makes up much of the utility.
What I wonder about, is this: is it true that most of the utility of a bottle of wine comes from the taste of the wine? Unless a person buys the wine specifically with the intent of becoming intoxicated, it would appear so...at least at first glance.
What people are trying to get, when they buy a bottle of wine, is indeed an experience. Part of that experience is the taste. Part of it may be intoxication. But part of it is an expression of -- and investment in -- self identity.
If you buy a 40 oz. bottle of Budweiser, you become, in part, a person who buys Budweiser. Perhaps it is hard to see the utility in that, but apparently there is some. After all, a leather Budweiser NASCAR jacket will set you back $200. Someone must see some value in it.
Spending money on self-image is nothing new. Selling self-image is probably the world's second-oldest profession.
It is easy to measure things in the brain. But figuring out exactly what it is that you are measuring can be exceptionally difficult. Figuring out what the measurements mean, may be impossible.
Find more posts in:
Brain & Behavior
Technology

Comments
"Selling self-image is probably the world's second-oldest profession."
Actually selling self image is what the world's oldest profession does very well.
Posted by: jayh | January 31, 2008 5:03 PM
Some more thoughts
This is fascinating. There have been quite a few blind tests where even experienced tasters have wound up preferring a cheaper product on occasion (other times they have picked the 'better' one).
Part can be dismissed as placebo, but there are also other (more or less valid) factors at work:
Sometimes a more expensive product (especially a highly variable item) is more consistently good, and less likely to disappoint.
We do place weight on experiences of others, as social beings. Often this helps us to make good choices, but it sometines fails us. Nonetheless it is probably a useful psychological attribute.
Selection may be a social factor. Prestige is useful (even in attracting mates--so it has evolutionary validity) If it helps you socially, it has utility.
Posted by: jayh | January 31, 2008 5:10 PM