Seed Media Group

Search this blog

Profile

cc-head-41px.jpg


Corpus Callosum is written by a psychiatrist at a small community hospital somewhere in midwestern USA. Email to cc.scienceblogger at gmail dot com.


Banner images from CNS Forums. Banner font: Ringbearer.



Subscribe with Bloglines
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Feedburner Feed


Quick Add-Feed Links...

add to My YahooSubscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add to My AOL
Add to PageflakesAdd to Netvibes
 Add to GoogleSubscribe in Rojo


Widgetize!
Change Congress



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll


The main blogroll has been moved to its own page, so as not to delay the opening of the main page.

Carnivals



synapsebutton.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg

Evilutionists!

tbbadge.gif

Skeptics Circle

Other Stuff


Daily Toon Click to enlarge
ANDERTOONS.COM PSYCHIATRY CARTOONSPsychiatry Cartoonsby Andertoons



Science Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory




« Tech Tip #6 | Main | Psychotherapy for Terminal Cancer Patients »

Roundup-Resistant Weeds

Category: Armchair MusingsBioethicsEnvironmentScience News
Posted on: April 15, 2008 8:57 AM, by Joseph j7uy5

Here at ScienceBlogs, we've regularly posted about the thorny issue of antibiotic overuse, and the subsequent antibiotic resistance.  This is a good example of evolution in action; it's also a good reason why we need to study and understand evolution.  

But antibiotic resistance is not the only such example.  The same principle applies to herbicides and weeds.

Naturally, a good example comes to us courtesy of , the company that everyone loves to hate.  (There is even a movie now, The World According to Monsanto.  It's on Google video, here.)

You see, Monsanto has made a lot of money by engineering crops that are resistant to their most popular herbicide, ® (). The idea is that you can plant these crops, then bathe the field with Roundup.  The herbicide kills the weeds, but the crops are unaffected.

Any biology sophomore could tell you, that sooner or later, you will get Roundup-resistant weeds.

Now it has been documented.  Roundup was first used in 1976.  In 1996, Monsanto introduced Roundup-ready soybeans.  No Roundup-resistant weeds were detected before the widespread use of the resistant crops.  Even then, it took a while.  But now...

Glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Mid-South
Mar 19, 2008 10:09 AM, By David Bennett
Farm Press Editorial Staff

Johnsongrass, the latest entry to the lengthening list of glyphosate-resistant weeds — in both Arkansas and Mississippi — was announced in mid-March. It is the first glyphosate-resistant warm-season grass found in the United States.

“We’re not trying to push resistance in these weeds,” says Bob Scott, Arkansas Extension weed specialist. “But there’s close to 5 million acres of Roundup Ready crops that get two or three applications of Roundup every season. Plus, we’re using Roundup as a burndown.

“It’s inevitable that such weeds are produced. It’s hardly a surprise.”

Johnsongrass found in a Crittenden County soybean/wheat field is the fifth glyphosate-resistant weed discovered in Arkansas. The others: horseweed (also known as marestail), common ragweed, giant ragweed and Palmer amaranth, a pigweed...

Johnsongrass () is notable because is it an invasive species that can be toxic to livestock.  

In the long run, it may not matter, since industrial-scale agriculture may not be around much longer.  The thing is, the genetic modifications are now in the wild.  There is no way to put the genie back in the bottle.  It is not possible to fully anticipate the consequences.  

One could argue that the benefits outweigh the risks.  After all, the more food we can grow, the more people we can feed.  It would be nice to eliminate hunger.

But, what if our ability to engage in industrial farming is time-limited?  that is, what if we can only do it for a few decades, before the petroleum necessary for this kind of farming becomes too scare to be used for this purpose?  What is no alternatives are found, or if they are found but not deployed?

Then, we will have grown a population of humans that is too large for the planet to support.  Many of them will die.  Sure, some people will have made a lot of money off the scheme, but does this really make sense?

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

Some would argue we have already exceeded the population the planet can support. As for the money, Monsanto would argue that it is in business to make money. Being in business for any other reason would escape them. A sad situation, though, that must be solved some other way...

Posted by: RichB | April 15, 2008 12:34 PM

"the genetic modifications are now in the wild."

That's a misleading way of putting it - "modifications" suggests that it happened "on purpose", implying that the weeds are glyphosphate resistant because the Evil Genetic Modifications™ have somehow jumped from the soybeans to the Johnsongrass.


As far as I can tell, this is a natural evolutionary adaptation not related in any way to the engineered crops, and not a spread of the "engineered" genes into wild populations.


That said, does it make me a bad person that when I read this I thought "Wow! Cool!" for purely scientific reasons?...

Posted by: Epicanis | April 15, 2008 12:35 PM

Unfortunately, the "wow" factor is pretty low for Midwestern farmers trapped in whatever cycle of seed-weed profitability Monsanto chooses to impose upon them. As a former biology sophomore, I can tell you that this kind of thing has been going on in one form or another for decades now.

Posted by: Dirkh | April 16, 2008 12:10 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most Active

  1. How sad 05.11.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Even sleazier than the DI 05.11.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Why Crashing Internet Polls is Neither Boring nor Stupid 05.11.2008 · Greg Laden
  4. Comcast: Cap bandwith? 05.11.2008 · Orac
  5. 42 05.11.2008 · Coturnix

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com