Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

The Corpus Callosum

The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.

Search

Profile

cc-head-41px.jpg


Corpus Callosum is written by a psychiatrist at a small community hospital somewhere in the USA. Email to cc.scienceblogger at gmail dot com.


Banner images from CNS Forums. Banner font: Ringbearer.
Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences


Subscribe with Bloglines
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Feedburner Feed


Quick Add-Feed Links...

add to My YahooSubscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add to My AOL
Add to PageflakesAdd to Netvibes
 Add to GoogleSubscribe in Rojo


Widgetize!
Change Congress



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll


The main blogroll has been moved to its own page, so as not to delay the opening of the main page.

Carnivals



synapsebutton.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg

Evilutionists!

tbbadge.gif

Skeptics Circle

Other Stuff



blog counter

« Bible Wiki Complaint: May Bring Inaccuracy | Main | Firefox 3 Download Day »

Your Choice: Smart Car or Grizzly

Category: Social Commentary
Posted on: June 15, 2008 1:38 PM, by Joseph j7uy5

Ohio has just approved certain smart cars for use on roadways.  This may strengthen our country by reducing use of fossil fuels.  

nmg_car.jpg


In other news, Blackwater USA is trying to get its Grizzly APC licensed for use on America's roadways.

photo_grizzly.jpg


Pretty soon, you might have a choice.  In fact, in November, you will have a choice.

BTW, does anyone know why Blackwater would want to be able to drive Grizzlies on American roads?

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/74131

Comments

1

That Grizzly looks vaguely like the armored tornado-chaser shown on the Discovery Channel.

Posted by: Karen | June 15, 2008 4:55 PM

2
BTW, does anyone know why Blackwater would want to be able to drive Grizzlies on American roads?
No doubt to do their patriotic duty in taking a full and active part in the patriotic Wars on Terror and Drugs.

Posted by: Sven DiMilo | June 15, 2008 6:33 PM

3
does anyone know why Blackwater would want to be able to drive Grizzlies on American roads?

Whatever the reason, it can't be good. Blackwater has already shown itself to be a loose cannon (sorry, couldn't resist). I don't even want to think about what could happen if wingnut hate-group militias or drug gangs got hold of a couple of those puppies.

@ Karen: I knew I recognized it from somewhere!

Posted by: themadlolscientist | June 15, 2008 7:07 PM

4

"I don't even want to think about what could happen if wingnut hate-group militias or drug gangs got hold of a couple of those puppies."

Since I have no aversion to thinking, I'll do it for you: Little would happen. Armor is near useless without infantry and resupply. "Wingnuts" in a few armored vehicles would be pinned down until their fuel and ammo ran out, and then fires would be built underneath the vehicles, resulting in prompt incineration or surrender.

P.S. Street legal means they can be shipped without needing a rail car or flatbed truck. Very handy for foisting APCs on National Guard units and cops with more money than sense.

Posted by: Daniel Newby | June 15, 2008 8:51 PM

5

Blackwater built a 100,000 sq-ft factory to make these things. Sure, they might be some local police departments or NG units that will pay for them, but the cost is estimated at >$500,000. It is hard to imagine that they will sell very many locally. I tend to think they are counting on the US having more counter-insurgency quagmires, selling them to the US government, or maybe to other countries.

But maybe there will be local sales. Some municipal police departments have helicopters, after all.

Posted by: Joseph j7uy5 | June 16, 2008 2:13 AM

6

I thought LAPD already had a few armored vehicles.

Posted by: Daniel Newby | June 16, 2008 9:17 AM

7

I am not claiming to have any expertise in armored vehicles, as that was not really the point of the post. ALl I know is that the LAPD did have an armored car in Die Hard, or Die Hard II, or Die Hard III, or maybe IV. One of those. And it got blown up. I don't know if they got another one.

Posted by: Joseph j7uy5 | June 16, 2008 10:22 PM

8

It was "Die With a Hard On", aka "Die Hard VII". As it turns out, LAPD was able to lease three M1A1 Abrams Main Battle Tanks, but last I heard was that the tanks got repo'd, and so now they're using Herby, from "The Love Bug".

Posted by: stumpy | June 16, 2008 10:50 PM

9

Re: BTW, does anyone know why Blackwater would want to be able to drive Grizzlies on American roads?

Answer: The Blackwater SS needs mobility when it comes time to crush dissenting Americans.

Posted by: B | October 23, 2008 2:35 PM

10

FYI, this vehicle is not armor in the traditional sense. It mounts, at the most, a 12.5 mm MG; russian scout vehicles carry more weaponry. This is, first and foremost, a IFV, and so would never be operating without a full section of soldiers, or special task force, or whatever. Thus, in an urban environment, it is very effective; you don't have to worry about getting pinned down because you have 8 guys in the back ready to go as soon as the vehicle stops. And good luck trying to blow the thing up with anything less than a tank or missile.
Also, if blackwater wants to build it's own version of an armoured car, let them; you may think they're loose cannons, but they are by far the least "unstable" of private security companies. If the American government wants to crush dissenting americans, it won't use these. It'll just use tanks. :P

Posted by: CJ | March 26, 2011 5:21 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.