I wanted on the team that went to Egypt, though. I had other priorities, like medical school. Can't do everything.
Anyway, here is an illustration of the critter:
Yes, those are legs on that whale. The successful excavation
of the 16-meter (50-foot) specimen is noted at Amazing
Nature.
Obviously, Basilosaurus is a poster fossil for evolutionists. The historical significance is discussed at Laelaps; the genetic basis for the limbs is discussed at Pharygula.
Actually, the discovery is not new. They found it back in the 1980's. But it was fully excavated this year. The plan is to prepare it for exhibition. The preparation will be done at the University of Michigan, but it will be exhibited in Egypt (which is only fair; it belongs to them). Gingrich would like to make a complete cast for exhibition at the UM Exhibit Museum of Natural History in Ann Arbor, but the article does not say whether that actually will happen.
I hope it does. I still remember going to that museum when I was four years old. Made quite an impression. A 50-foot skeleton (or cast) would be great, although I don't know where they would put it.
Obviously, Basilosaurus is a poster fossil for evolutionists. The historical significance is discussed at Laelaps; the genetic basis for the limbs is discussed at Pharygula.
Actually, the discovery is not new. They found it back in the 1980's. But it was fully excavated this year. The plan is to prepare it for exhibition. The preparation will be done at the University of Michigan, but it will be exhibited in Egypt (which is only fair; it belongs to them). Gingrich would like to make a complete cast for exhibition at the UM Exhibit Museum of Natural History in Ann Arbor, but the article does not say whether that actually will happen.
I hope it does. I still remember going to that museum when I was four years old. Made quite an impression. A 50-foot skeleton (or cast) would be great, although I don't know where they would put it.
Life Science
Comments
Thanks for the link! Just one small correction;
"Actually, the discovery is not new. They found it back in the 1980's"
Actually, Basilosaurus was named in 1834! The reason why it is has "saurus" in its name was because the first described remains were thought to belong to a gigantic seagoing reptile, and it was only in the 1840's that the remains were recognized to belong to a whale. Since Basilosaurus came first, though, the name has priority.
(I have written about Basilosaurus and toothed whales here, too.)
If I'm not mistaken, the Basilosaurus discovered in Egypt in the 1980's was a new species, Basilosaurus isis, which is the one I think you refer to in the post. These were the specimens that revealed the existence of the tiny hind limbs for the first time in this genera.
I didn't want to nit pick; I just thought you might like to know!
Posted by: Laelaps | November 14, 2008 8:08 AM
"Obviously, Basilosaurus is a poster fossil for evolutionists"
Perish the thought. God just created it to strengthen the belief of creationists. It just went extinct because those tiny legs made it fall off the Ark.
Posted by: Romeo Vitelli | November 14, 2008 8:38 AM
Posted by: Even Stephan | November 18, 2008 5:36 PM