In 2008, we
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7574684.stm">were
informed that a kind of cloud formation had been named: the mammatus
formation, so-called because it resembles a breast. Sort
of. Whatever.
A new development is more serious. The
href="http://cloudappreciationsociety.org/">Cloud Appreciation Society
has suggested that the name asperatus be given to clouds that
portray a particular kind of turbulence.

Flickr photo by Vince Perritano, Creative Commons license
Other, more dramatic examples can be seen at the BBC page,
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8076000/8076805.stm">A
New Kind of Cloud?, at National Geographic,
href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/photogalleries/new-cloud-pictures/index.html">New
Cloud Type Discovered?, and, of course, at the Cloud Appreciation
Society,
href="http://www.cloudappreciationsociety.org/gallery/index.php?x=browse&category=52&pagenum=1">‘Asperatus’,
a new variety of cloud?
Every schoolkid knows that there are
href="http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/%28Gh%29/guides/mtr/cld/cldtyp/home.rxml">four
main types: nimbus, cirrus, stratus, and cumulus. (Actually,
there are many cloud types, although many of the names are
derived from the four listed above. Some are not: noctilucent
clouds,
contrails, funnel clouds, to name a few. See the
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cloud_types">Wikipedia page.)
This classification had stood since 1953. Why mess with it
now? If you do, there’ll be committee meetings and newspaper
articles. People will be chanting “Teach the Controversy!”
Then we will have to change all the textbooks (assuming the Texas Board
of Education goes along with the scheme, which may not happen
easily).