Bank Lobbyists Are Not Only Trying to Kill NEW Legislation, They Are Trying to Weaken EXISTING Regulations
By George Washington of Washington's Blog.
Everyone knows that the lobbyists for the financial giants are trying to kill any tough new regulations.
But they are also trying to weaken existing regulations.
Specifically, Robert Borosage notes:
The [derivatives] bill that the House will consider on Wednesday creates a clearinghouse, not a publicly managed exchange. It also allows banks to decide that a deal is so unique that it needn't be posted on the clearinghouse. The best experts in the field -- like Michael Greenberger of the University of Maryland -- warn that the legislation might end up WEAKENING current law. That is no small achievement, because, as we saw in the collapse of AIG, current law is toothless...
This version appeared on Naked Capitalism. The full post has all the sausage-y details, including a mention of the Democratic congressperson who is leading the charge to weaken financial oversight, who happens to have gotten more than two million dollars from the finance, insurance, and real estate (FIRE) businesses and coalitions.
Open Secrets tallies the FIRE lobbying expenditures and calculates the return on the investment: 258,449 percent.
And to illustrate a perverse oddity: Simon Johnson (Baseline Scenario) shows how the US Chamber of Commerce is lobbying against the interest of its own membership: The Chamber of Commerce Has It Backwards.









