The report is available at Thomson Reuters, free registration required. Note that this says nothing about quality; it is all about quantity. (HT: Paul Kedrosky) For a counterpoint, also see Kedrosky's post on China's empty city.
The Corpus Callosum
The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.
Search
Profile
Corpus Callosum is written by a psychiatrist at a small community hospital somewhere in the USA. Email to cc.scienceblogger at gmail dot com.
Banner images from CNS Forums. Banner font: Ringbearer.
Feedburner Feed
Quick Add-Feed Links...
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Recent Posts
- Fixing the Fellowes
- Agave From Root Cuttings
- Shrink Rap Survey on Attitudes Towards Psychiatry
- Hobbyist propagation of Agave lechuguilla
- Similarities between the BP Disaster and the Tepco Disaster
- The Inhofe Nothingburger
- Flickr Pic(kr) 14
- Insufferable Arrogance® Now Mine
- Our Infrastructure is so bad, we have to get electricity from Mexico.
- Nabokov Theory on Polyommatus Blue Butterflies Is Vindicated - NYTimes.com
Recent Comments
- Geri on Something To Try Sometime
- Stan on Pecan Pie for Thanksgiving
- Sesli Chat on Agave From Root Cuttings
- Betty on Block African witchcraft curses against McCain and Palin NOW!
- afrika mangosu on Selection of Antidepressants: Elavil -- amitriptyline
- Jenna on Milnacipran (Savella™) Approved for Fibromyalgia
- Julia on Selection of Antidepressants: Elavil -- amitriptyline
- Connor on Errors in Texas Textbooks
- stumpy on Fixing the Fellowes
- Barry G on AMA Slides Into Irrelevancy
Categories
- Academia
- Antidepressants
- Armchair Musings
- Basic Concepts
- Bioethics
- CME
- Chatter
- Computing
- Energy
- Environment
- Humor
- Medicine
- Meta
- Neuroscience
- Personal
- Photos of Interest
- Politics
- Propaganda
- Psychiatry
- Public Health
- Science News
- Science in the Media
- Social Commentary
- Social Issues
- Uncategorizable
- economy
Archives
- January 2012
- August 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Blogroll
The main blogroll has been moved to its own page, so as not to delay the opening of the main page.
Carnivals
Other Stuff
« Undercurrent? | Main | Where Does All the Sulfur Go? »
Trends in Volume of Scientific Publication
Category: Academia • economy
Posted on: November 24, 2009 1:13 AM, by Joseph j7uy5
The USA still leads the world int he number of scientific papers
published per year. Germany and Japan were essentially tied
for second, for years. According to a recent report by
Thomspon-Reuters ISI, there is a new player at the table:
The report is available at Thomson Reuters, free registration required. Note that this says nothing about quality; it is all about quantity. (HT: Paul Kedrosky) For a counterpoint, also see Kedrosky's post on China's empty city.
The report is available at Thomson Reuters, free registration required. Note that this says nothing about quality; it is all about quantity. (HT: Paul Kedrosky) For a counterpoint, also see Kedrosky's post on China's empty city.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/125397
Comments
The big difference between the corporate- or capitalistic-leaning sects and those of the recently and somewhat jokingly dubbed “edupunk” sect are in the underlying ideology of mashups, a do-it-yourself mentality, and above all affording learners and educators sufficient flexibility and opportunity to guide and discover their own learning paths. They thrive on open source technology, and the the notions of sharing and reuse.
target=” www.onlineuniversalwork.com ">
www.onlineuniversalwork.com
Posted by: Jessie Amelio | April 9, 2010 7:44 AM
The big difference between the corporate- or capitalistic-leaning sects and those of the recently and somewhat jokingly dubbed “edupunk” sect are in the underlying ideology of mashups, a do-it-yourself mentality, and above all affording learners and educators sufficient flexibility and opportunity to guide and discover their own learning paths.
Posted by: hutyrzolder | April 17, 2011 1:50 PM