Now on ScienceBlogs: Charles Darwin February 12, 1809 - April 19, 1882

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

The Corpus Callosum

The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.

Search

Profile

cc-head-41px.jpg


Corpus Callosum is written by a psychiatrist at a small community hospital somewhere in the USA. Email to cc.scienceblogger at gmail dot com.


Banner images from CNS Forums. Banner font: Ringbearer.
Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences


Subscribe with Bloglines
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Feedburner Feed


Quick Add-Feed Links...

add to My YahooSubscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add to My AOL
Add to PageflakesAdd to Netvibes
 Add to GoogleSubscribe in Rojo


Widgetize!
Change Congress



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial -Share Alike 3.0 United States License.

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll


The main blogroll has been moved to its own page, so as not to delay the opening of the main page.

Carnivals



synapsebutton.jpg

th_elogo1.jpg

Evilutionists!

tbbadge.gif

Skeptics Circle

Other Stuff



blog counter

« Texas Bans ALL Marriages | Main | Trends in Volume of Scientific Publication »

Undercurrent?

Category: Armchair MusingsPoliticsSocial Issues
Posted on: November 23, 2009 9:11 AM, by Joseph j7uy5

Is there some kind of especially violent undercurrent right now, in the right-wing river of hate?

Ed Brayton just posted about a billboard put up by the GOP, specifically the Lafayette County (Missouri) Republicans:

I-70 Billboard 11_19_09.jpg

The sign (bigger view in new window) reads:

A Citizens Guide to Revolution of a corrupt government.
1. Starve the Beast.
2. Vote out incumbents.
3. If steps, 1 & 2 fail?

PREPARE FOR WAR--LIVE FREE OR DIE!"

"Starve the beast," by the way, is a phrase that refers to the neoconservative policy popularized by Grover Norquist: "My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub."  What makes this nonsensical is that the starve-the-beast philosophy has nothing to do with corruption; it is a non sequitur.  Plus, the starve-the-beast strategy was to use large budget deficits so that social programs would become unaffordable.  The current Administration is doing that rather effectively.  So in effect, they are calling for a revolution because the Administration is doing what they want!  Need I say, this doesn't make any sense at all.  It is totally muddled thinking.

Now I see this, from US Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN):

 "I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax because we need to fight back. Thomas Jefferson told us, "Having a revolution every now and then is a good thing," and the people - we the people - are going to have to fight back hard if we're not going to lose our country. And I think this has the potential of changing the dynamic of freedom forever in the United States."

What is deeply strange about this, is that she said it in response to a question about proposed cap-and-trade legislation!  There have been many revolutions in the history of this Earth, for various different reasons, but I am not aware of any that has been staged because of environmental legislation.  While her proposal does not suffer from the complete lack of logic that the Lafayette County Republicans exhibit, it does suffer from a complete lack of common sense. 

I'm not hooked in to the the firehose-of-hate email/talk radio stream, so I don't know if there is any connection.  Media Matters noted, on 30 September 2009, that there is a "trend of extremist right-wing rhetoric."  They gave several examples.  However, they did not really demonstrate a trend.  That would be difficult to prove.  Still, there is some evidence.  Last month, a Boston Globe article mentioned "a new wave of antigovernment fervor."  The article is about an increase in threats against the President:

A [Southern Poverty Law] Center study released in August found a nearly 35 percent growth in racially based domestic hate groups since 2000 - from 602 to 926. The center concluded that opposition to Obama's election has only increased the phenomenon..."One result has been a remarkable rash of domestic terror incidents since the presidential campaign, most of them related to anger over the election of Barack Obama.''

Threatening language has also found its way into talk radio broadcasts and social networking websites, raising fears that individuals not normally considered threats to the president could be incited to violence...
"The racist extremist fringe is exploiting themes that strike a chord in the mainstream more than we have seen in the recent past,'' said Brian Levin...

Ronald Kessler, author of In the President's Secret Service, notes that threats against President Obama are four times more common than they were against President Bush.  Frank Schaeffer, author of Patience with God: Faith for People Who Dont Like Religion (or Atheism), states with conviction that these threats are escalating, and are serious.  Moreover, he links them to the evangelical movement.  He was interviewed by Rachel Maddow, as featured on Crooks and Liars (it's the second video on the page):

But there is a crazy fringe to whom all these little messages that have been pouring out of Fox News, now on a bumper sticker, talking about doing away with Obama, asking God to kill him.

Really, this is trawling for assassins. And this is serious business. It's un-American, it's unpatriotic, and it goes to show that the religious right, the Republican far-right, have coalesced into a group that truly wants American revolution, and if it turns out to be blood in the streets and death, so be it. This is not funny stuff any more. They cannot be dismissed as just crazies on the fringe...

...Look. This is the American version of the Taliban. The Taliban quotes the Qu'ran, and al Qaeda quotes certain verses in the Qu'ran, in or out of context, calling for jihad, and bloody war, and the curse of Allah on infidels. This is the Old Testament, Biblical equivalent of calling for holy war. Now, most Americans'll just see the bumper sticker and smile and think that it's facetious. Unfortunately, there are 22 million Americans or so who call themselves super-conservative evangelicals. Of this, a small minority might be violent. But, the general atmosphere here is really getting heated...

Meanwhile, Glen Beck:

...says he wants to go beyond broadcasting his opinions and start rallying his political base -- formerly known as his audience -- to take action.  To do so, Mr. Beck is styling himself as a political organizer. In an interview, he said he would promote voter registration drives and sponsor a series of seven conventions across the country featuring what he described as libertarian speakers...

In other words, Beck wants to become a community organizer.  I can't tell if this is stranger than it is frightening, or the reverse. 

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/125303

Comments

1

I'm not hooked in to the the firehose-of-hate email/talk radio stream, so I don't know if there is any connection.

I am.

There is.

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | November 23, 2009 10:57 AM

2

Two good blogs for following all this: Talk To Action & Orcinus. Also (no link to avoid moderation filter), see the Southern Poverty Law Center at www.splcenter.org.

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | November 23, 2009 11:01 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.