The Frontal Cortex

Obama

I’ve got a serious man-crush on Obama. I swooned during his Meet the Press interview – my girlfriend was getting jealous – and couldn’t help but yelp when he announced that he is considering a run for president. (Given his candid non-denial, I’d be surprised if he didn’t run. You don’t flirt with Tim Russert if you’re not serious about following through.) Watching Obama flash his telegenic smile, I suddenly sympathized with all the baby boomers who still wax nostaligic for RFK. Here is a man of pure potential, an eloquent speaker come to save us from an impossible war.

That said, I realize Obama has no executive experience, and very limited senatorial experience. But I think neither of these qualifications matter. First of all, I’m afraid Bush has singlehandedly disproved the CEO model of president. Being in charge of the Texas Rangers and the state of Texas was clearly not very helpful when it came to leading this country. I think Obama said it best: “I’m not sure anything prepares you for being president.”

As for his limited service as a senator…isn’t that a good thing? I fear that if Obama stays in the Senate too long he’ll end up like Joe Biden or John Kerry. He’ll learn how to dither and pontificate, but forget that Americans don’t care about the procedural minutia. He’ll have another thousand difficult votes to defend. After all, part of Obama’s allure is that he didn’t vote on Iraq. As Richard Cohen notes:

I want Obama to run because he would come into the race with no baggage on Iraq. Not from him would we hear excuses about how he was misled by the Bush administration into thinking there were weapons of mass destruction there. Obama not only was against the war when he ran for the Senate but he can claim — as could the 21 Democratic senators who voted against the war resolution — that it was possible to accept the “facts” at the time and still see that the war was unnecessary, if not downright stupid. It just makes me wince every time I hear John Kerry or John Edwards or Joe Biden or Chris Dodd or Hillary Clinton say they were misled, fooled, lied to or some other version of seduced and abandoned — otherwise they would have voted the right way. This is disingenuous.

So while I’m daydreaming, I may as well tell you about my dream ticket. It’s got a zero likelihood of every happening, but it’s still fun to contemplate. First, Colin Powell realizes he’s not actually a Republican. Then, Obama wins the Democratic nomination. Then, Obama asks Powell to be his VP. Powell accepts, and shields Obama from charges that he lacks foreign policy expertise. The McCain-Frist ticket loses to the Obama-Powell ticket in a landslide.

Update: Noam Scheiber says it better.

Comments

  1. #1 Orac
    October 24, 2006

    I seriously fail to see the appeal of Obama. I just can’t.

    He’s inexperienced, for one thing, and I strongly disagree that lack of executive experience doesn’t matter in a President. It’d be taking a big gamble that Obama could learn on the job fast enough, given his lack of background. In any case, just because Bush’s “CEO model” didn’t work out doesn’t mean that it’s not a good model. Bush just turned out to be a fairly lousy CEO.

  2. #2 bigTom
    October 24, 2006

    Well Orac, that fellow that was just deposed by the coup in Thailand had been a successful CEO. I don’t want to hunt around to try to find his name. So we have two recent examples, of CEO presidents failing miserably. The CEO position basically gives a person the power that comes from controlling hiring/firing, a president only has that power over his own cabinet, so he has got to be able to persuade and compromise. Clearly some minds are too inflexible to make the transition.
    I suspect that the most likely 08 ticket is Hillary/Obama, I wish it were reversed, but I think that one seems most likely. I think Powell basically lost it, by being too loyal, I consider him to now be “damaged goods”.

  3. #3 Wholesomedick
    October 25, 2006

    I have been supporting a Hillary-Obama ticket since 2004.

    However, there are reasons to be skeptical of Obamania.

    http://blogs.zmag.org/node/2803

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!