Jon Stewart, interviewing Tal Ben-Shahar, who teaches a positive psychology class at Harvard:
"I was a psychology major, so I know a lot of it is bullshit."
Watch the video here.
Profile
Jonah Lehrer is a contributing editor at Wired. He's also written for The New Yorker, Seed, Nature, the Boston Globe and is a contributor to Radio Lab. He's the author of Proust Was A Neuroscientist. His new book is How We Decide.
My Books
Search
Recent Posts
- Smell and Memory
- Crying Babies
- Sleep
- The Gay Animal Kingdom, Part 2
- Temptation
- Arts Education
- The Gay Animal Kingdom
- The Neuronovel
- Dopaminergic Aesthetics
- Grocery Shopping
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
« Don't Read the Business Page | Main | Lesch-Nyhan »
The Daily Show on Psychology
Category: Culture
Posted on: August 10, 2007 8:06 PM, by Jonah Lehrer
Share on: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
Trackbacks
Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/47718
2
I was just surprised that Jon Stewart was a psych major. I'm not eager to weigh in on the "bullshit" question.
3
aaaah. Well obviously, not ALL of psychology is BS... Maybe Stewart picked his major based on what classes the pretty girls were taking. Certainly psychology is less depressing than, say, PoliSci.
4
I would note that many people, like Stewart in the segment, seem to believe that branches of psychology are BS because they aren't inherently reductionist. I think that's mistaken. Lots of uber-reductionist neuroscience is BS (ie, it's utterly wrong and will be disproved in 5 years) but I think many of the core tenets of social psychology, for example, have aged very well. Just look at cognitive dissonance. That's a fifty year old theory that is still as relevant and applicable as ever. So if it's BS, then it's BS that has stood the test of time.
5
There is not that much point in getting worked up over an entertainer, who wasn't even totally dismissive. Psychology is just more bullshit-tolerant than other sciences. Objectivity is difficult and sometimes undesired when your subject is you. Psychological theories do not have the benefit of mathematically defined concepts like physics and chemistry. And unlike biology, the model system is a black box. And unlike all 3, its parameters are sensitive to social bias. In order to tell what is bullshit and what is not in psychology you have to be very critical and vigilant, things people are often not wont to be. And Jonah's right, an important feature of a good theory is if the resultant airplane will fly, and certainly there are many examples from psychology.
Post a Comment
(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)
Comments (5)
and you agree? What's your point?
Posted by: tekel | August 13, 2007 10:27 AM