Now on ScienceBlogs: 'The Secret World of Naked Snakes': a ZSL event

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

« Guitar Hero 2 and Plasticity | Main | More Book News »

McEwan, Nabokov and Fake Science

Posted on: November 29, 2007 10:13 AM, by Jonah Lehrer

Ian McEwan is mischievous. He ends Enduring Love - a novel about a science writer - with a carefully faked psychiatric study from a non-existent British medical journal. Although the syndrome discussed in the article is real - De Clerambault's Syndrome is the delusional belief that someone else is in love with you - the particulars are all pretend. And yet, when Enduring Love was first released, most critics assumed that the journal article was, in fact, the inspiration for the novel. Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, a former book critics for the New York Times, even went so far as to complain that "When you discover at the end of the book an appendix documenting the case history on which 'Enduring Love' is based, you think you know what is wrong. Mr. McEwan has simply stuck too close to the facts and failed to allow his imagination to invent."

I bet that McEwan's inspiration for this academic ruse was the Foreward to Lolita, written by "John Ray, Ph.D". Nabokov had a long-standing grudge against all things Freudian, and he uses the Forward to mock the stilted vocabulary and vague theories of psychoanalysis. John Ray (1627-1705), by the way, was an English naturalist who helped pioneer botanical classification. Nabokov was familiar with the work of Ray through his lepidopterist research.

Via Mind Hacks

Share on: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/56875

Comments (3)

1

I've heard that McEwan used the idea of game theory in the first scene with the balloon.

All those people hanging on, were said to be in a classic prisoner's dilemma.

That is one of the best scenes I have ever read in my life.

The rest of the book paled in comparison.

Posted by: alice | November 29, 2007 10:32 AM

2

Nabokov also pulled a "Sokal Hoax" back in 1939. He invented a fake poet, "Vasiliy Shishkov", and when a famous literary critic of Berlin's Russian emigré community praised Shishkov's work (the man hated Nabokov's), he published a short story in which he, Nabokov, met Vasiliy Shishkov and was entrusted with Shishkov's notebook. The poet, afflicted with melancholy, had decided to "dissolve" himself in his own work.

Posted by: Blake Stacey | November 29, 2007 1:45 PM

3

But Nabokov was mocking Psychoanalysis and McEwan complicitly abides the paradygm of case studies. Isn't there a difference? Isn't one a kind of seeing through and another mentally lazy?

Posted by: Anonymous | April 19, 2009 12:10 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM