Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab: Time is Ticking!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

« Connectivity and Status Anxiety | Main | The Psychology of the Sale »

Magic and Neuroscience

Posted on: April 21, 2009 2:54 PM, by Jonah Lehrer

I've got a new article in the latest issue of Wired, guest-edited by J.J. Abrams. It's quite an excellent issue, I think, although I'm still utterly befuddled by the hidden puzzles on the glossy pages. My article is an investigation of what stage magicians can teach us about the human mind and the frailties of perception:

For Teller (that's his full legal name), magic is more than entertainment. He wants his tricks to reveal the everyday fraud of perception so that people become aware of the tension between what is and what seems to be. Our brains don't see everything--the world is too big, too full of stimuli. So the brain takes shortcuts, constructing a picture of reality with relatively simple algorithms for what things are supposed to look like. Magicians capitalize on those rules. "Every time you perform a magic trick, you're engaging in experimental psychology," Teller says. "If the audience asks, 'How the hell did he do that?' then the experiment was successful. I've exploited the efficiencies of your mind."

Now that on-the-job experimentation has taken an academic turn. A couple of years ago, Teller joined a coterie of illusionists and tricksters recruited by Stephen Macknik and Susana Martinez-Conde, researchers at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, Arizona, to look at the neuroscience of magic. Last summer, that work culminated in an article for the journal Nature Reviews Neuroscience called "Attention and Awareness in Stage Magic." Teller was one of the coauthors, and its publication was a signal event in a field some researchers are calling magicology, the mining of stage illusions for insights into brain function.

And here's the peer-reviewed paper.

Share on: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/107618

Comments (4)

1

Cool, James Randi was one of the authors also....

Posted by: William | April 21, 2009 5:33 PM

2

Amazing. Especially such an 'easy' tricks as 'Vanishing-Ball Illusion'. I could hardly believe it until saw it with my own eyes. It's really funny thing that our brain ignores some facts in order not to be over-flooded with, but those facts happen to can be crucial, however.

I wonder if children, as they don't have so many schemes yet, are also so easy to be deceited?

BTW - it's good to know, that when somebody seems too trustworthy, it probably is not trustworthy at all, as pickpockets mentioned in the paper.

Just to sum it up: if something looks almost unbelievable - it's good just to take another look at it (if possible).

Posted by: wybory sondaze demokracja | April 23, 2009 12:51 PM

3

very useful information absolutely agree

Posted by: Pet Sevenler | April 25, 2009 5:23 PM

4

Amazing. Especially such an 'easy' tricks as 'Vanishing-Ball Illusion'. I could hardly believe it until saw it with my own eyes. It's really funny thing that our brain ignores some facts in order not to be over-flooded with, but those facts happen to can be crucial, however.

Posted by: sere serpe | November 16, 2009 5:42 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM