Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab: Time is Ticking!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

« Processing Power | Main | Market Analysis »

Radiolab

Posted on: June 16, 2009 7:10 AM, by Jonah Lehrer

There's a new full-length podcast out from the world's finest science radio show. It's on "Stochasticity," which is a great word because 1) it sounds really fancy but is actually a rather simple idea 2) it's an essential concept when it comes to understanding lots of different stuff, from neural oscillations to quantum physics.

I make an appearance on the episode to help explain what was happening inside the mind of Ann Klinestiver, a high-school English teacher who developed a severe gambling addiction after taking a dopamine agonist. (I also tell this story in my book, but it's much better to hear Ann tell her own story. She's an incredibly brave and kind person.) The larger point is that our brains rebel against stochasticity, which describes any system containing an inherently non-deterministic element. Whenever we detect a hint of randomness - and it doesn't matter if this occurs while watching basketball or playing the slots - our neurons automatically try to solve the disorder, as they parse the stochastic system into (illusory) patterns.

PS. Carl Zimmer has a wonderful segment on the episode as well, where talks about the useful "sloppiness" of life.

Share on: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Trackbacks

Trackback URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/112524

Comments (3)

1

I'm interested in the comment made by you in the Radiolab interview that went along the lines of "we edit what happens to preserve that sense of the streak". In other words, we selectively edit input to fit hypotheses, and perhaps even predictions, of our world.

This seems connected with our brain, at a neural level, seeking inputs that match neural expectations. Hence, if I am thinking of buying a red BMW, then all of a sudden I notice more red BMWs about. Would you say that this is the same or a related phenomenon?

I'm also interested in how this connects with the frame effect. Given that the limbic brain is generally not as accessible, or articulate perhaps, as the 'cognitive' brain (neocortex), where does the need to apply meaning to a random world arise from? Is it limbic or neocortical in origin?

Thanks for another great post ...

Andrew

Posted by: Andrew Mowat | June 16, 2009 8:31 PM

2

this puts a real human element to all the science behind things, i really enjoyed it

Posted by: Riley | June 18, 2009 11:23 PM

3

http://wwwsavingourselves.blogspot.com
NO dot after the last "w"

Posted by: Alfred Handler | June 27, 2009 11:45 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM