Now on ScienceBlogs: "Global Warming is not real because weather patterns have stabilized in the last 10 years!" Why statements like this need a little context.

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Search

Profile

14243_318928475292_541515292_9701050_3340719_n.jpg Rebecca Skloot is an award-winning science writer, and a contributing editor at Popular Science magazine; she's worked as a correspondent for the NPR show RadioLab, and PBS Nova ScienceNOW. Her writing appears in The New York Times Magazine, O: The Oprah Magazine, Discover and others. She teaches in the University of Memphis's creative writing program. Her first book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, is forthcoming from Crown on February 2, 2010. It tells the story of HeLa -- the first immortal human cell line ever grown in culture (pictured in the blog's banner) -- the woman those cells came from, and the family she left behind. Click Welcome to Culture Dish for an introduction to this blog and its author.

Skloot-Related Links

Subscribe to Culture Dish

Subscribe via RSS here or get Culture Dish delivered via email by clicking here. Add to your NetworkedBlogs on Facebook here.

Widget_logo

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Permissions

All written material on the site is the copyright of the author and may not be reproduced or redistributed without permission.

« Famous Six Degrees of Separation Study a Fraud? | Main | Documents for my ScienceOnline 09 Getting Published Talk »

Halucinate Without Drugs - AKA Fun With Neuroscience

Category: NeurologyWeird Science
Posted on: January 17, 2009 10:44 AM, by Rebecca Skloot

I'm speaking at the ScienceOnline09 Conference in Durham, NC, today so I have little time to post, but I wanted to throw up this fun thing from the Boston Globe to keep everyone occupied while I'm away:

"DO YOU EVER want to change the way you see the world? Wouldn't it be fun to hallucinate on your lunch break? Although we typically associate such phenomena with powerful drugs like LSD or mescaline, it's easy to fling open the doors of perception without them: All it takes is a basic understanding of how the mind works."

Try for yourself here.  I particularly like the rubber hand trick. [Update:  fascinating and detailed post about this research over on Neurophilosophy, here]

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/90955

Comments

1

Mmm, I still prefer LSD...

Posted by: Valis | January 18, 2009 4:12 AM

2

Hahaha.....

Long ago, I got the chance to "hang out" in an isolation tank. I was told I would last no more than twenty minutes. With no sensory input, the brain invents it's own version of a reality. It was a very intense, phantasmagoric three hour mental excursion with plainly heard music and voices, intense hallucinations, episodes of terror and euphoria. Whole bizzare story-lines unfolded in the mind unbidden.

The floating in salt-water was extremely relaxing, but the wild internal journey: not for the faint of heart.

Posted by: kamaka | January 18, 2009 8:16 PM

3

Figured this one out for myself during my misspent youth many, many years ago. You can skip the ping pong balls if the light source is bright enough; just keep your eyes closed and the lids serve as diffusers. The ability to regulate the frequency is important. Substitute Hendrix for white noise and throw a thimble full of lizard shit in the bong and you're good to go.

Posted by: Blind Squirrel FCD | January 18, 2009 10:30 PM

4

What about this one: eyes wide open!
All that it takes is sitting with a calm mind. I am an experienced meditator (± 20 years) and the following experience happened to me a couple of times. With eyes wide open, I could clearly see two images at the same time: the image of the wall in front of me and mental images without any sense (a boot dipping in melted chocolate!).

The experience is somehow hard to describe because it was like seeing two movies at the same time. Images were as clear as they can be. I have the feeling that it may be possible to see even more than two images at the same time: as these images are the "product" of the mind, why stop at two? I am joking... But the fact is that "seeing" is at least as mental a process than a sensory one.

Posted by: Engatnomal | January 20, 2009 1:39 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM