Official Comment Count: 1,032,719

screenshot_02.jpg

Profile

scubacraig.jpg Craig is temporarily a post-doctoral fellow at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute who is looking for a permanent position. He spends most of his time balancing his overwhelming geekdom with normalcy so he can function in the real world. Luckily his wife likes his geekiness.



peter_chinchorro.jpg Peter Etnoyer is a Graduate Research Associate at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. He studies deep corals and ocean fronts, and he loves to be on the water.



kevvygumby%20copy.jpg Kevin Zelnio is a Graduate Student Researcher at Penn State studying the ecology of hydrothermal vent and methane seep communities. He raises awareness of the plight of the spineless through folk music.

Google All DSN Posts


Awards & Affiliations


ecodaredevil.jpg
Nature Blog Network
Oceana
support_plos_100x157.jpg
Add to Technorati Favorites
thinkingblogger2ql6.jpg 2162223913_dc43c05edc_o.png

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Deep Sea News has moved! Make sure to update your bookmarks and feed readers.

« Offshore Oil Deposit Holds Out on the Human Race | Main | Arctic mounds have gassy past »

No Fish, No Cry...

Category: Industry & Government
Posted on: February 17, 2007 3:11 PM, by CR McClain

Why no cry? Because the government is picking up our paycheck! To further prove the economic futility of a deep-sea fishery.

Out of AAAS in San Francisco...

Rashid Sumaila and Daniel Pauly of the University of British Columbia in Canada recently studied the subsidies paid to bottom trawl fleets around the world. They found that the fleets receive over $152 million each year and that without these funds, the deep-sea fisheries industry would operate at a $50 million annual loss."From an ecological perspective we cannot afford to destroy the deep-sea," says Sumaila. "From an economic perspective, deep-sea fisheries cannot occur without government subsidies. The bottom line is that current deep fisheries are not sustainable." Pauly adds: "There is surely a better way for governments to spend money than by paying subsidies to a fleet that burns 1.1 billion litres of fuel annually to maintain paltry catches of old growth fish from highly vulnerable stocks, while destroying their habitat in the process."

So what countries subsidize?

  • Japan
  • South Korea
  • Russia
  • Spain
  • Australia
  • Ukraine
  • Faroe Islands
  • Estonia
  • Iceland
  • Lithuania
  • Estonia
  • Latvia
  • France
For once the U.S. is not leading the way to destroying the globe, well at least not through destroying the deep.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs