Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab: Time is Ticking!

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Deep Sea News

All the news on the Earth's largest environment

screenshot_02.jpg

Profile

scubacraig.jpg Craig is temporarily a post-doctoral fellow at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute who is looking for a permanent position. He spends most of his time balancing his overwhelming geekdom with normalcy so he can function in the real world. Luckily his wife likes his geekiness.



peter_chinchorro.jpg Peter Etnoyer is a Graduate Research Associate at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. He studies deep corals and ocean fronts, and he loves to be on the water.



kevvygumby%20copy.jpg Kevin Zelnio is a Graduate Student Researcher at Penn State studying the ecology of hydrothermal vent and methane seep communities. He raises awareness of the plight of the spineless through folk music.

Google All DSN Posts


Awards & Affiliations


ecodaredevil.jpg
Nature Blog Network
Oceana
support_plos_100x157.jpg
Add to Technorati Favorites
thinkingblogger2ql6.jpg 2162223913_dc43c05edc_o.png

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

My book is coming out. Include a link and thumbnail.

Other random info. A link.

Deep Sea News has moved! Make sure to update your bookmarks and feed readers.

« Big Day for Science, Bad Day for Hagfish | Main | No Fish, No Cry... »

Offshore Oil Deposit Holds Out on the Human Race

Category: Conservation & Environment
Posted on: February 17, 2007 6:06 AM, by CR McClain

This week's post, There is Plenty of Oil, generated a heated discussion about the finer points of peak oil and oil reserves.  In line with oil reserves, I noted that offshore deposits are unlikely to sustain global oil consumption or even delay the oil peak predicted originally by Hubbert.  Less than one year ago, the chariman for Global Petroleum was speaking optimistically about a Woodside-Dana-Global Petroleum joint venture, that would begin developing Kenya's offshore oil fields.

Dr. Armstrong said that the Kenya acreage has the potential to become a significant oil region:

  • Woodside currently regards Kenya as having "multiple large structural prospects" (November 2005 Woodside presentation);
  • Woodside's mapping and seismic surveys have identified more than 30 prospects and leads, a number of which are each capable of holding several hundred million to a billion barrels of recoverable oil;
  • The first prospect to be drilled is likely to be Pomboo in L-5 and the second possibly Sokwe in L-7;
  • Both prospects have reservoir objectives in rocks of Cretaceous and Tertiary age which elsewhere in the world contain a large proportion of the world's known oil and gas reserves;

Hooray! We are saved! Honey, gas up my Hummer!

But today...Disappointment sets in over the ambitious exploration project.

101 million dollars later...

This precedes the decision by Woodside and its partners to call-off the second oil exploration venture in Kenya last month.

The first oil exploration costing 7 billion shillings that began in October last year failed to find oil or gas.

But what about all those promising prospects and the several billion barrels of oil?  Apparently it was a waste of time for Chikyu. 


TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/33555

Comments

1

I understand "significant" to mean "so much that it's not a drop in the ocean compared to Saudi Arabia, Iraq, or Iran." which is good news as far as it goes.

But deposits capable of removing the peak to a distant future would have to be *far greater* than Saudi Arabia, Iraq, or Iran. So I'm never impressed by news of "significant" oil finds, even if they do deliver on their promises. Which as you say, they haven't, again.

Posted by: derek | February 17, 2007 10:37 AM

2

Since when did anecdote become a scientific form of argument? Deep Sea News would be much better off sticking to science.

Posted by: nick | February 22, 2007 6:07 PM

3

Nick thank you for your opinion. Which is just that. DSN is what it is. If you don't like, don't read.

Posted by: CR McClain | February 22, 2007 6:17 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM