Seed Media Group

screenshot_02.jpg

Profile

scubacraig.jpg Craig is temporarily a post-doctoral fellow at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute who is looking for a permanent position. He spends most of his time balancing his overwhelming geekdom with normalcy so he can function in the real world. Luckily his wife likes his geekiness.



peter_chinchorro.jpg Peter Etnoyer is a Graduate Research Associate at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. He studies deep corals and ocean fronts, and he loves to be on the water.



kevvygumby%20copy.jpg Kevin Zelnio is a Graduate Student Researcher at Penn State studying the ecology of hydrothermal vent and methane seep communities. He raises awareness of the plight of the spineless through folk music.

Google All DSN Posts


Awards & Affiliations


ecodaredevil.jpg
Nature Blog Network
Oceana
support_plos_100x157.jpg
Add to Technorati Favorites
thinkingblogger2ql6.jpg 2162223913_dc43c05edc_o.png

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« Who Owns The Black Swan? | Main | I'm Blogging At Sea Baby! »

Who Owns The Black Swan? Pt II

Category: Industry & Government
Posted on: May 29, 2007 8:14 AM, by CR McClain

fm_039.jpg

Yesterday in Part I, I noted that a Spanish newspaper published a picture allegedly from a port employee showing a coin with a bust of King Charles III, ruler of Spain in the 18th century, suggesting the Black Swan was indeed Spanish. Greg Stemm, co-founder of Odysssey Marine Exploration stated the coin featuring Charles pictured in the papers is not from the wreck. Yesterday Roy stated that the picture in the paper was from the Franklin Mint Website (above). The newly developed Merchant Royal Shipwreck Blog (interesting indeed) notes that the picture below is the picture from the Spanish paper. I cannot confirm this as I have not seen the original photo in the Spanish paper (ABC). This site seems to support the idea that the Spanish press lied.

monedacarlosiiida1.jpg

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

#1

Well at least they gave Charlie some soft focus; because let's face it: the man was ugly.

Posted by: Tegumai Bopsulai, FCD | May 29, 2007 9:21 AM

#2

That first image is actually much larger than it appears on screen, and the WIDTH= and HEIGHT= tags are being used to scale it down. You might want to avoid that - it slows down both download and rendering for people with (respectively) slow Net connections or slow computers. It would be better to make a small image and let it display at full size - possibly with a link to the large version for those who want to click to see it.

Posted by: Matthew Skala | May 29, 2007 11:04 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com