Seed Media Group

screenshot_02.jpg

Profile

scubacraig.jpg Craig is temporarily a post-doctoral fellow at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute who is looking for a permanent position. He spends most of his time balancing his overwhelming geekdom with normalcy so he can function in the real world. Luckily his wife likes his geekiness.



peter_chinchorro.jpg Peter Etnoyer is a Graduate Research Associate at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. He studies deep corals and ocean fronts, and he loves to be on the water.



kevvygumby%20copy.jpg Kevin Zelnio is a Graduate Student Researcher at Penn State studying the ecology of hydrothermal vent and methane seep communities. He raises awareness of the plight of the spineless through folk music.

Google All DSN Posts


Awards & Affiliations


ecodaredevil.jpg
Nature Blog Network
Oceana
support_plos_100x157.jpg
Add to Technorati Favorites
thinkingblogger2ql6.jpg 2162223913_dc43c05edc_o.png

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

« Things that eat coral | Main | The Nematocyst: apex of organelle specialization »

Footprint of the Atomic Age in the world's oceans

Category: Coral
Posted on: May 1, 2008 8:43 AM, by Peter Etnoyer

Hiroshima_sm.jpgNews outlets enjoyed a field day last month reporting on the amazing vitality of Porites sp. coral colonies in the South Pacific Bikini Atoll where Americans tested the fifth most powerful atom bomb ever exploded 54 years ago. The Bravo bomb was a 1000 times more powerful than the bomb at Hiroshima. It vaporized three islands, raised water temperatures to 55,000 degrees, rocked islands 200km away and left a crater 2km wide and 73m deep. According to a recent field survey, the crater is filled today with luxuriant coral beds.

Trees of branching Porites coral up to 8m high have been established, creating thriving reef habitat in what should be an atomic wasteland.

Chris Rowan of Highly Allocthonous covered the story with pictures that clearly indicate large and healthy colonies of branching scleractinia. About 50 species of coral previously known from the site were gone from the reef though...

"probably due to the 23 bombs that were exploded there from 1946-58, or the resulting radioactivity ... ambient gamma radiation on the residential island of Bikini atoll was fairly low - but when [researcher Maria Beger] put the Geiger counter near a coconut, which accumulates radioactive material from the soil, it went berserk."

That's hot. Reef building corals are incredibly resilient. The missing coral species are fragile lagoonal specialists that have yet to recover. But Rick MacPherson of Malaria, Bedbugs, Sea Lice, and Sunsets points out that ecological connectivity played an important role in the rate of the reef recovery. Bikini got lucky. New larvae were likely imported from nearby Rongelap Atoll, a large healthy upstream reef system where atomic testing was not conducted.

noaa_bamboo_sm.jpgOne thing missing from the discussion so far is the fact that the radiocarbon signature of wartime aggression and atomic testing in the 1950's is currently present in the otoliths of fish and the skeletons of shallow and deep-sea corals around the world. Those wartime years left a global footprint on the world's oceans.

For example, deep sea researcher Brendan Roark of Texas A&M and colleagues collected a bamboo coral from a Northeast Pacific seamount peak 700m deep in the Gulf of Alaska in 2002. The team used laser ablation techniques on a cross section of the coral to identify a Carbon 14 spike in the axis of the skeleton, and then used that benchmark to determine the coral's age somewhere between 75-125 years old.

It's amazing, isn't it, that the Atomic Era left an indelible mark on the world's oceans, and that science still finds this quite useful. A big question remains. Reef corals can survive a nuclear attack, but will they survive the onset of climate change?

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

#1

Quick correction:

The Castle Bravo test is in fifth place, at 15Mt. The largest was the Soviet "Tzar Bomba" which delivered about 50Mt in a reduced yield test of a 100Mt bomb. The Soviet Union also preformed three reduced yield tests of 50Mt warheads, generating between 21 and 25Mt.

Posted by: Rick Pikul | May 1, 2008 1:02 PM

#2

Thanks for keeping me honest, Rick.

Posted by: Peter | May 1, 2008 1:14 PM

#3

"The team used laser oblation techniques"

I think you mean "laser ablation", the process whereby a powerful laser is used to ablate the surface off of a solid sample for chemical analysis.

Posted by: Lab Lemming | May 1, 2008 6:33 PM

#5

Thanks, Lab Lemming.

Posted by: Peter | May 1, 2008 8:41 PM

#6

Well, I thought it was a good article. Hehe. ;)

Posted by: trog69 | May 2, 2008 11:53 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com