Now on ScienceBlogs: A virus walks into a bar . . .

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Deltoid

Phallic Symbols

Nosy wrote: Saying all firearms are phallic symbols is stupid and a lie. Bizarre. Nosy is apparently unaware of the difference between a phallus and a phallic symbol. No, the whole concept of a "phallic symbol" is discredited and worthless...

Search

Profile

Tim Lambert Tim Lambert (deltoidblog AT gmail.com) is a computer scientist at the University of New South Wales.

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

Deltoid Facebook Group

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Full archives

Links

Blogroll

16th

« Are with-knife assaults as dangerous as with-gun assaults? | Main | Are stab wounds as dangerous as gun shot wounds? »

Phallic Symbols

Category: silly
Posted on: February 5, 1994 7:00 AM, by Tim Lambert

Nosy wrote:

Saying all firearms are phallic symbols is stupid and a lie.

Bizarre. Nosy is apparently unaware of the difference between a phallus and a phallic symbol.

No, the whole concept of a "phallic symbol" is discredited and worthless concept. I'm not aware of any respectable schools of psychology that still teach it, except as an example of bogus methodology. The concept seems to survive only in non-scientific circles such as feminist literary criticism. To apply a term that is known to be meaningless is "stupid and a lie."

Let me get this straight: You claim

  1. The term "phallic symbol" is meaningless. and

  2. Therefore, to apply it is a lie.

Statement 1. is false and even if it were true, statement 2 does not follow.

Statement 1 is false:
You yourself admit that the term is used in literary criticism. If the original post had been to sci.psychology you would arguably have a point, but it wasn't so you don't. Furthermore, everyone seemed to understand that by talk.politics.phallic-symbols Ted meant talk.politics.guns. If "phallic symbol" was as meaningless as you claim, the reaction would have been "Huh?" instead of the silly flames that we saw.

Statement 2 does not follow from statement 1:
The term "sdfsdfdsf" is meaningless. According to you, the statement "Sdfsdfdsfs are green." is a lie. Nope. The statement is merely meaningless.

As for your claim that it was "stupid", the effect of that one line seems to have been to make several pro-gunners look stupid, so "part of Ted's devious master plan to make pro-gunner's look like idiots" might be a better description :-)

Share on: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/93506

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM