Category: dgu
Ray writes: Danny's obvious reading disability has not allowed him to read this when I posted it before. Maybe he can get a friend to read it to him this time: W A Collier writes: Ray, one question for you:...
Read on »
Posted by Tim Lambert at 1:39 AM • • 0 TrackBacks
Category: dgu
W A Collier writes: How the NCVS miscounted DGUs Undersized sample, poor methodology, bias in the questions, unsound methods and procedures in eliminating bias, and unlike Kleck, they started with the conclusion (there are only a small number of gun...
Read on »
Posted by Tim Lambert at 11:07 PM • • 0 TrackBacks
Category: dgu
I argued that the estimate of 200,000 DG woundings derived from Kleck's survey (p163 of TG) was inconsistent the estimate of 7700-18,500 DG woundings on page 164 of TG. Kleck accuses me of sloppy reading for not noting that the...
Read on »
Posted by Tim Lambert at 1:37 PM • • 0 TrackBacks
Category: dgu
Gary Kleck writes: my position that estimates of DGUs with a wounding are unstable is correct. The prevalence of DGUs with a wounding in the Kleck-Gertz (K-G) survey was 0.0011 (1.326% of U.S. adults had a DGU of some kind...
Read on »
Posted by Tim Lambert at 1:37 PM • • 0 TrackBacks