The latest quiz to sweep blogspace is this quiz, which tests your ability to distinguish between quotes from comments at Little Green Footballs and quotes from Late German Fascists. Matt Yglesias' post on the quiz triggered an extremely ill-tempered comment thread. In the spirit of my previous quiz pages, this one lets you post your score on the LGF quiz.
Deltoid
Flypaper for trolls
The latest quiz to sweep blogspace is this quiz, which tests your ability to distinguish between quotes from comments at Little Green Footballs and quotes from Late German Fascists. Matt Yglesias' post on the quiz triggered an extremely ill-tempered...
Search
Profile
Tim Lambert (deltoidblog AT gmail.com) is a computer scientist at the University of New South Wales.
Recent Posts
- Competitive Enterprise Institute intends to sue blogger over moderation policy
- "Even the tobacco companies never tried to slander legitimate cancer researchers"
- On those stolen CRU emails
- AAP reports from the future
- Plimer calls his critics "rent-seekers"
- Global Warming Skeptics score own goal
- The Australian's War on Science 41
- Are CSIRO scientists still being gagged?
- Open Thread 35
- Tom Fuller
Recent Comments
- John McKay on Competitive Enterprise Institute intends to sue blogger over moderation policy
- WotWot on Competitive Enterprise Institute intends to sue blogger over moderation policy
- Janet Akerman on AAP reports from the future
- Charles on "Even the tobacco companies never tried to slander legitimate cancer researchers"
- Hank Roberts on "Even the tobacco companies never tried to slander legitimate cancer researchers"
- Gaz on AAP reports from the future
- llewelly on "Even the tobacco companies never tried to slander legitimate cancer researchers"
- Bud on On those stolen CRU emails
- Janet Akerman on On those stolen CRU emails
- dhogaza on On those stolen CRU emails
Categories
- Ask a ScienceBlogger
- Brignell
- CFCs and ozone
- DDT
- Fumento
- Global Warming
- Gregg Easterbrook is an idiot
- Iraq
- LancetIraq
- Lott
- Milloy
- Open Thread
- Roy Spencer
- Skeptics Circle
- The War on Science
- academia
- astroturf
- bingo
- computers
- creationism
- criminology
- economics
- funny
- guns
- maths
- meet up
- meta
- personal
- politics
- random
- reviews
- statistics
- stupidity
- surveys
- world
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
Links
Blogroll
- Angry Bear
- Atmoz
- Backseat driving
- Barista
- Brad Delong
- Brave New Climate
- Bug Girls' Blog
- Climate Change
- Climate Feedback
- Climate Progress
- Climate Sight
- Club Troppo
- Crooked Timber
- David Friedman
- Eschaton
- Fafblog
- FiveThirtyEight
- Freakonomics blog
- Greenfyre's
- Gristmill
- Groklaw
- Hot Topic
- Hit and Run
- International Journal of Inactivism
- James' Empty Blog
- John Quiggin
- Jon Swift
- Kevin Drum
- Larvatus Prodeo
- Logical Science
- Making Light
- Millard Fillmore’s Bathtub
- More Grumbine Science
- Nexus 6
- Notes from the Lounge
- Oliver Willis
- Only In It For The Gold
- Open Mind
- Paul Krugman
- Political Animal
- Quark Soup
- Rabett Run
- RealClimate
- Sadly, No!
- TBogg
- The Loom
- The Panda's Thumb
- The Poor Man
- The Reality-based Community
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Think Progress
- TPM Cafe
- Unqualified Offerings
- AMK's Journal
- Andrew Norton
- Antony Loewenstein
- ArchPundit
- are you effin' kidding me?
- B and B
- Brian Linse
- Carnaby Fudge
- DeSmogBlog
- Detached Observer
- eRiposte
- Explananda
- Flop Eared Mule
- From a LAN Downunder
- Hoyden About Town
- Infothought
- John Fleck
- The Hard Sell
- Harry Clarke
- Known Unknowns
- Matt T
- Malaria Matters
- Mobjectivist
- Notional Slurry
- Opinion Dominion
- Palmer's Oz Politics
- Penguin Unearthed
- Pro Bono Statistics
- Pro-science
- Psyche, Science, and Society
- Public Nuisance
- Rants and Raves
- Say Uncle
- Section 15
- short notes: will brady's ruminations
- Skeptics' Circle
- skippy the bush kangaroo
- Some are Boojums
- Speedkill
- spiceblog
- Stephen Gloor
- stoush.net
- The Bartlett Diaries
- The Ethical Werewolf
- The Huffington Post
- The Myron Ebell Climate
- The Post-Normal Times
- The Virtual Stoa
- This Space For Rent
- Total Information Awareness
- Tug Boat Potemkin
- Wis[s]e Words
« Risky Business | Main | Baghdad murder rate, again »
Flypaper for trolls
Category: surveys
Posted on: April 14, 2004 12:50 PM, by Tim Lambert
Share on: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/92952
-
from ArchPundit : Hate Sites
Read More
Tracked on April 16, 2004 2:34 PM -
from damnum absque injuria : Time to Invoke Godwin's Law
Read More
Tracked on April 18, 2004 12:03 AM




Comments
My correct scores were mainly due to references to "statehood", which clearly alluded to the Palestinians. The rhetoric is pretty much identical
Posted by: John Quiggin | April 14, 2004 6:11 PM
Thanks for the plug, I've given you a reciprocal link on the LGF Quiz blog.
Posted by: Mr. Spock | April 15, 2004 3:12 AM
So, is there a follow up to this quiz that includes Palestinian quotes about Israelis?
Posted by: Slaggingham | April 15, 2004 7:55 AM
LGF reader "mary" has put together an interesting counter-quiz here: http://www.whataretheysaying.org/archives/000872.html
Posted by: Mr. Spock | April 15, 2004 9:10 AM
I was proud of the 100%, but to be honest I only took the quiz after I had already read a lot of comments regarding it, so perhaps I was prepped too much. Anyhow, I thought it was hard and it took me some time, but you could tell the Germans because they made it sound like genocide was a necessary evil, not something fun and easy.
Posted by: Anna in Cairo | April 15, 2004 4:56 PM
Granted, I did use the rule-of-thumb that the Little Green Footballers's comments would be more vulgar and joyful than the Nazis', so that helps explain the highish score. Still, the next time that Charles Johnson denies that he's running a playground for extremists, throw this quiz back at him, and ask -- once again -- how he manages to ban nutbars from the other side, but not his favourite extremists.
He still won't answer.
Posted by: Ian King | April 16, 2004 1:10 AM
Palestinian comments about Israelis aren't relevant here (neither are Israeli comments about Palestinian). The point is that LGF readers -- with Johnson's tacit approval -- are gleefully advocating the eradication of entire peoples. Now, LGF readers are (usually) American, often quite intelligent, can pass for rational on a good day, and held in high esteem by a greater section of the Right than one would hope is possible. That's scary!
I forget who said it (in a comment elsewhere), but the Nazis treated genocide as a duty, albeit one they weren't particularly upset about, and that's bad enough. But LGF readers treat it as if it's a goddamn spectator sport.
Posted by: mark | April 22, 2004 1:58 PM
It seems most scores are fairly high. That would indicate that it's fairly easy to tell the difference between Little Green Footballs and Late German Facists.
Did we prove something here, Mr. Spock?
Posted by: Powderfinger | April 24, 2004 3:10 AM
Hi Powder finger, Most of the feedback I've gotten indicates that it is actually pretty easy to tell the difference if you know what to look for - the Nazi quotes were translated from 1930s-era German speeches and letters and have a certain stiffness and formality about them while the LGFer quotes sound more modern and have a looser, more fluid sort of feel to them - the informal language of native speakers writing off the cuff remarks. Also, there were the contextual clues: the German did not makes references to "giving them a state" while the LGFers do not make appeals to "eternal values" or similarly high-flown abstractions.
Posted by: Mr. Spock | April 25, 2004 3:21 PM
"Mary"'s counter-quiz is kind of nonsensical though since it draws together three separate groups (leftists, greens, and fascsists) who, despite whatever LGFers may think, are quite different with no real overarching philosophical connection.
...Of course, some of the questions totally give it away. (The anti-Rumsfeld comment? Yeah, that's probably an LGFer... NOT! Or the one that explicitly references another LGF by name...)
Posted by: Shapeshifter | August 8, 2005 1:51 PM
Also: i managed an 85% on mr. spock's quiz. The thing to look for is the manner of speaking: the Nazis were articular and their propaganda refined, the LGFers are bloodthirsty racists without the ability to string coherent sentences together.
Posted by: Shapeshifter | August 8, 2005 1:54 PM
Damn! I only got 62% - a D. I hope that speaks to the lack of nuance in both fascist camp statements and not to my inability to tell actual Nazis from keyboarding Nazis.....
Posted by: Ariadne | December 7, 2005 5:51 PM