The law started in December 1998. Guns did not have to be registered until 2001. Violent crime was falling until very shortly after the law started doing anything, and the crime rates start rising consistently after that, with the biggest increase in 2002. It is falling before the law and for one year after and then rising consistently afterward.
Hmm, it was posted under the name of Lott’s son, but the writing style belongs to John Lott. Note that Lott has posted a five-star review of More Guns, Less Crime under Maxim’s name. I suppose it’s possible that John helped Maxim with the post.
John Lott posted on his blog:
Canadian long gun and shot gun registration was started in December 1998 and the guns were supposed to be registered by January 2001, though there was an extension until July 2001. Crime rates continued falling during the first full year of the program but rose consistent [sic] every year thereafter and in the lastest [sic] numbers for 2002 ended up higher than the last year prior to the law (1998).
Maxim, at least, seems to be better at proof reading his posts.
Anyway, on to the substance of their defence. The “consistent” increase is barely noticeable on the graph since it is an increase from 1.76 to 1.77 to 1.78. Given the normal random variation in crime rates, no person knowledgable in statistics would read anything into such an increase.
Furthermore, when you look at the official Canadian statistics you’ll see that there is a footnote on the 2002 homicide rates:
Part of the increase in 2002 is a result of 15 homicides that occurred in Port Coquitlam in previous years and that were reported by police in 2002. Homicide counts reflect the year in which police file the report.
If you adjust the the statistics to count those murders when they happened, the rates for 2001 and 2002 end up exactly the same at 1.80 each, and even Lott’s cherrypicked increase goes away.