Tim Lambert (deltoidblog AT gmail.com) is a computer scientist at the University of New South Wales.
Jennifer Marohasy has written a rather self-referential response to my criticism of the sixty scientists' letter. Rather than deal with the substance of my criticism, Marohasy, who works for the Institute of Public Affairs, predictably tried to attack my credibility, writing:
Rather than deal with the substance of the letter, Lambert, a computer scientist, predictably tries to attack the credibility of the scientists.
Of course, I did deal with the substance of the letter. When challenged in the comments, Marohasy claimed that there was some substance that I had not dealt with but would not say what it was.
Coby Beck also has some criticism of the substance of the letter here, though presumably Marohasy would claim that he did not deal with the real substance or something.
Comments
But the whole point about this letter is that it's an appeal to authority. That's why it has sixty signatories. That's why each signatory has a little micro-bio explaining why their opinion matters. But when you point out that the authority is bogus, you're making an ad hominem attack? Sheesh.
Posted by: Paul Crowley | April 11, 2006 3:07 AM
... Marohasy would claim that he did not deal with the real substance or something.
That takes me back. I haven't heard about the Real Substance since I was an altar boy. I couldn't even remember exactly what that was all about, but these days it's not hard to find a theologian if you need one:
I'm sure the thinking of global warming sceptics, Lancet denialists, creationists, sound science hacks and related species would become much clearer to us if we just went back to that good ol' Aristotelian philosophy. The trick is to ignore the outward appearances and see the real substance.
Posted by: Kevin Donoghue | April 11, 2006 4:05 AM
Tim, It's not a nice feeling to be misrepresented, however, I think you need to look at the source. Marohasy, is a shameless corporate shill, and should be ignored.
Posted by: David Heidelberg | April 11, 2006 5:34 AM
Kevin Donoghue, I'm quite sure that today I won't read a better comment than yours. Lots of things rolled neatly into a tidy package.
Best,
D
Posted by: Dano | April 11, 2006 11:17 AM
Kevin,
Ditto what Dano said. You have captured the essence of the denial lobby perfectly.
Posted by: Jeff Harvey | April 12, 2006 7:11 AM