Lancet study released

The Lancet study on deaths in Iraq has been released. Get it here. Here’s the summary:

Background An excess mortality of nearly 100 000 deaths was reported in Iraq for the period March, 2003-September, 2004, attributed to the invasion of Iraq. Our aim was to update this estimate.

Methods Between May and July, 2006, we did a national cross-sectional cluster sample survey of mortality in Iraq. 50 clusters were randomly selected from 16 Governorates, with every cluster consisting of 40 households. Information on deaths from these households was gathered.

Findings Three misattributed clusters were excluded from the final analysis; data from 1849 households that contained 12 801 individuals in 47 clusters was gathered. 1474 births and 629 deaths were reported during the observation period. Pre-invasion mortality rates were 5·5 per 1000 people per year (95% CI 4·3-7·1), compared with 13·3 per 1000 people per year (10·9-16·1) in the 40 months post-invasion. We estimate that as of July, 2006, there have been 654 965 (392 979-942 636) excess Iraqi deaths as a consequence of the war, which corresponds to 2·5% of thepopulation in the study area. Of post-invasion deaths, 601 027 (426 369-793 663) were due to violence, the most common cause being gunfire.

Interpretation The number of people dying in Iraq has continued to escalate. The proportion of deaths ascribed to coalition forces has diminished in 2006, although the actual numbers have increased every year. Gunfire remains the most common cause of death, although deaths from car bombing have increased.

Update: There is also a companion paper that provides more details. Anyone thinking of criticising the study should read the companion paper.

Comments

  1. #1 Jack Lacton
    October 12, 2006

    I’ve read the companion paper and it is a statistical debacle because they’ve missed one really big point.

    Tim L – You’re half smart with this stuff. Why not sit down and see if you can’t work out what they’ve missed/misinterpreted.

The site is currently under maintenance and will be back shortly. New comments have been disabled during this time, please check back soon.