The Register, an occasionally accurate online IT newspaper, has been running a series of warming denial pieces, by one Steven Goddard. Goddard has been trying to cast on temperature and ice data. Unfortunately, he does a whole lot of cherry...
On Saturday the Australian published an article by Jennifer Marohasy. It's the usual cherry-picked global-warming-ended-in-1998 nonsense, and Barry Brook has written a detailed refutation. But I felt I should post this graph from Marohasy's piece where she tries to make...
Richard Littlemore has posted an annotated transcript of his debate with Monckton, with corrections to Monckton's numerous false statements. Andrew Bolt thinks the best argument that Monckton had in the debate with Littlemore was his defamation of one of the...
Another post on John Mashey's virtual blog. Everything that follows is from comments posted here by Mashey, lightly edited. This long essay grew from a dialog in this thread into something that may be a more general resource than just...
Alicia Newton, an Associate Editor of Nature Geoscience, discovers the truth about CO2Science: But rather than its promise of "separating reality from rhetoric in the emotionally-charged debate that swirls around the subject of carbon dioxide and global change", on the...
It seems like extreme gullibility must be a job requirement for reporters at Channel Nine. You might recall how Adam Shand uncritically accepted everything he was told by global warming skeptics and aggressively disputed the mainstream science. Tara Brown has...
I think LOLdenialist macros deserve their own thread. You can make your own with this convenient online tool. You can't post images in comments, so email them to me at deltoidblog AT gmail.com. It doesn't have to be AGW denial...
Via Gummo Trotsky, the latest argument posted by Jennifer Marohasy: Radiative equilibrium is one of the foundation stones of radiative forcing theory. But it is not a law of physics, only a rather archaic and untested supposition found in climatology...
People have noticed that there was an advertisement for Bjorn Lomborg's Cool It! on ScienceBlogs. Seed's sales staff know not to accept ads for Creationists, psychics and pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo, so how did Lomborg slip through? Well, he's managed to...
Barry Brooks, Sir Hubert Wilkins Chair of Climate Change at the University of Adelaide, has started a blog, Brave New Climate. Check it out. Of particular interest to Deltoid readers is his post on David Evans. After his claims about...
Last year I wrote about Steve Milloy's latest scam -- a $100,000 if you prove the existence of harmful AGW. Of course, since Milloy judges whether your prove is good enough, you know he'll never pay up, just as you...
John Mashey emails me a link to a video a Naomi Oreskes talk about the Western Fuels Association's PR campaign against the global warming science. Mashey's summary of her talk:...
This piece by Arthur "Let's bomb Iran!" Herman published by the Australian and the CIS, has it all. the author is a historian, not a scientist every single claim about the science is wrong climate scientists are called "knaves" ,...
Atmoz examines a Climate Audit thread as Steve McIntyre and company wrestle with the question of why the northern hemisphere is warming faster than the southern hemisphere....
Clif at Sadly No mocks some blogger who thinks that because the draft report Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States used a photoshopped picture of flood to illustrate a flood, rather than a picture of a real flood,...
Robert Grumbine writes Since I'm an ice guy, I'm saddened that a place with ice in its name turned out to be unreliable. Still, I wandered over there and took a look at the first article ... The article was...
You can now sign the "Sue Us" peition, which calls for those people who keep threatening to Sue Gore and Hansen to do so. See also Frank Bi's post on promoting the petition....
Tamino has written three posts explaining what is wrong with Roy Spencer's calculations of a low climate sensitivity. See Part 1, Part 2and Part 3. Brief summary: 90 days of data is not enough to estimate climate sensitivity....
Global warming skeptics just keep trying to show that Hansen's projections in in his 1988 climate model were wrong. We've had Pat Michaels, who dishonestly erased scenarios B and C from Hansen's graph, Willis Eschenbach at Climate Audit, who used...