I recently left a comment on Tom Fuller’s blog objecting to Fuller’s claim to be on the middle ground.
If Fuller is in the middle ground, then so is Inhofe — they both think that climate scientists are a bunch of frauds.
Fuller objected in a completely unrelated comment thread and derailed the discussion. I’m starting a new thread here for discussion with Fuller.
Here, in his own words, are Fuller’s beliefs about climate scientists:
I believe that a generation of climate scientists have tried to make global warming a political football, and have exaggerated or distorted the truth to push politicians into acting more robustly, and too instill a fear-driven sense of urgency in the general public.
Inhofe shares this belief with Fuller. And like Inhofe, Fuller claims that the hockey stick graph is fraudulent:
People apparently didn’t learn from the horrible example set by Michael Mann et al in fabricating a Hockey Stick chart of global temperatures that was later debunked.
You can judge for yourself whether I have fairly represented Fuller’s views.