Posted by By popular request, here is the Jonas thread. All comments by Jonas and replies to his comments belong in this thread.
Comments
-
… and Jonarse is also reduced to the ‘AGW will fall… any day now’….. without a scintilla of …anything at all except the vacant crowing he’s indulged in for almost two years now.
I really wish I had a GBP for every time the desperate old (and it got old a long, long time ago) ‘final nail’ or variation thereof was uttered by some crank or other.
I can only presume it’s not for the benefit of the rational, but only aimed at his ever more meat headed posse.
-
Wow
it is certainly true that you have not seen any proof of any eduction I have. But that is because you don’t have the slightlest clue about what knowledge actually is, and how educated knowledge is used. As you said yourself:
It was spelled out in detail right under your nose. And every time you failed to see it.
And yes, my dear Wow .. what I have produced here, when someone actually tried to argue som minor scientific points, is exactly that: Proof of that I master the things I am talking about.
What you have proven … Well, rather not go there!
-
chek ..
vacant crowing .. for almost two years now
I think you have been hanging here much longer than that. And not even been close to addressing any relevant issues.
But seriously, why is it that (almost all of) you regulars here are so patently incapable of comprehending what is actually argued (by others)? Why is that? Why is almost every comment from you regulars nothing but a long parade of strawmen, invented idiocy and mouth frothing but childish attempts at insults?
Are you (all) real as incapable of arguing one single point properly as you (all) demonstrate here?
I think the closest you’ve ever been to any relevant substance was when you argued that indeed many people live in Bangladesh and India plains ..
Yes they do, but that doesn’t make glacial melt their fresh water supply. Which was the idiotic AGW-scare you tried to argue or support back then.
But I do believe that you “really wish [you] had a GBP for every time ..”. That seems more like your general method, wishing for things … and being angry because they ain’t so ..
-
Ah Jeff …
Maybe you missed it, and thus I repeat it once more. If there ever was a good example of DK, David Roberts ‘explaining climate science in 15 minutes’ was one of the better displays.
As were you, when you hailed his absolute nonsense and even claimed that your ‘understanding’ of this was due to your claimed ‘scientifif literacy’.
The exact opposite is true, my dear Jeff. Roberts many claims were absolute hogwash, they were the atithesis of scientific literacy, and only complete fools or ignorants would by into his claimed ‘future assertions’, especially based on the arguments he delivered.
And that one of those even and explicity claimed that only the ‘scientifically illiterate’ would fail to be swayed by his ‘arguments’ was the killer …
Man Oh man … if there ever was a DK-syndrome posterboy, or if one would like invent a charicature of one, that would be it Jeff. That would be you, hailing David Robers future-predictions and even claiming this was real science …
You nailed it Jeff, you really did!
Just as when you wrote that “Stu nailed it”, you proved beyond any doubt that you are completely incapable of judging anything relevant to real science …
Another funny example of your complete lack of selfawareness was when accused someone (don’t remember who) of resorting to insults when he ran out of arguments. You Jeff!
You accused others of resorting to insults for lack of better arguments! Again, you nailed it, Jeff. absolutely priceless.
But actually, I don’t think Dunning and Kruger really were envisioning you and your problems when they wrote that paper. Your affliction seems to be something way beyond only not understanding what knowledge it is you don’t have.
-
“it is certainly true that you have not seen any proof of any eduction I have.”
Yes, the cause of which is you never having put any of it on here.
-
“It was spelled out in detail right under your nose.”
Nope, it was never put in ANY detail on this thread.“And every time you failed to see it. ”
Yes, imaginary postings are not seen by those not hallucinating.
-
Exactly Wow …
You are completely incapable here, failing already at the first doorstep, unable to even see the posts where points are made.
No surprise there. I just hope that Jeffie (or somebody else who ignorantly pretends to speak for ‘the science’) comes and proclaims: ‘Wow nailed it!’
It happened for Stu, and I’ll remind him and Jeff about it … until they take their nonsense back. Which in all likelihood is never!
-
Yes, exactly.
Something you never wrote can never be seen, therefore my inability to see invisible writings is not my problem.
-
We already see that you cannot see, you see
-
Again .. simple comments held up for 24+ hours …
I guess it’s for the ‘protection’ of the sensitive souls here ..
-
OK … it was for more than three days! Those poor Deltoids must need som serious protection. And I kinda agree ..
-
Yes, not seeing something not there is fine.
Seeing something that is not there is a sign of mental instability.
-
It happened for Stu, and I’ll remind him and Jeff about it … until they take their nonsense back.
Medication, Jonas. Take it. Good God you are delusional. And knock it off with your pathetic persecution complex, you pathetic little liar.
-
Stu … according to the resident nonsense-inventor ‘you nailed it’! When yo too made invented absolute nonsense-claims. That’s because both you and Jeffie so desperately want to believe in an alternate universe. I think Wow is too delusional to know which one is which. Seemingly both his fantasy and the one he resides in are the same
I see you are coming to the rescue or at least support of Wow here .. Why don’t you proclaim that Wow nailed it, Stu?
He says all kinds of things that you too would say (and then some). You three (and there are more) could easily form a ‘consensus’ which you could use to even further bolster your beliefs in its veracity!
After all, that’w what you are all about: Believing things without evidence!
-
Wow … Stu couldn’t see anything wrong with luminous’ ramblings. You couldn’t even see where I told him he was wrong.
I believe you. You are exactly that kinda guy … unable to see things out there in plain view .. The idea that you would understand any of the finer points discussed here or anywhere else …
Well that’s plainly laughable. And you don’t. And no, one shouldn’t laugh at your predicament. I am just hoping that one of the others comes along and claims: “Wow nailed it!”
That would top it off for me!
-
Again .. it ‘took’ trhee days for those last two post to ‘appear’ … You poor deltoids really need to be fed it slowly …
-
Joan, we’re not saying anything about Luminous.
We’re saying YOU have never shown anything wrong with Luminous’ posts.
-
So stop changing the topic and show us your proof.
-
Wow ..
I totally believe that you never saw anythiong wrong with whatever luminous wrote, that you didn’t even could see where I pointed out his many errors.
You are just way too dumb too being capable of anything lika that. But I am still hoping that some of the others ‘endorses’ your idotic rantings and claims ‘Wow nailed it!’ just like Jeffie, the DK-loonie hoped that ‘Stu nailed it!’
You ar such a pathetic bunch of know-nothings it defies belief! But them you believe in every syllable of the CAGW-scare too. And think you are a vast majority …
There are clinical terms for such beliefs …
-
I totally believe that you never saw anythiong wrong with whatever luminous wrote
Who cares?
What you haven’t done is actually shown anything wrong with whatever luminous wrote.
And you know this, which is why you keep changing the topic.
April 9, 2013
April 10, 2013
April 12, 2013
May 6, 2013
May 10, 2013