June 2013 Open thread

More thread for you.

Comments

  1. #1 chek
    July 1, 2013

    Here you go Professor Fuckwit – this should answer your questions.

    Finding out for yourself is always a better way to learn, don’t you find? Unless of course for ‘health reasons’ you exclude yourself from doing anything useful beyond whining like stripped gear.

  2. #2 chek
    July 1, 2013

    #93 wasn’t an answer, Professor Fuckwit.
    It was an observation in question form and a further question. I guess insanity isn’t as much fun as it’s cracked up to be for you. It’s certainly hard-baked tedious for the rest of us.

  3. #3 freddy
    July 1, 2013

    chek teh stupid asshole, you scientology climate pupils are NEVER precise, light weight want-be

    your link is IN NO WAY an answer to my questions!!!! where is the list of stations jones has used of a specific year for temperature averaging?????

    you cannot read, FUCKWIT CROOK

  4. #4 bill
    July 1, 2013

    Freddy, we seem to have got off on the wrong foot.

    The problem seems to stem from the fact that you are attempting to discuss the issue of climate change, a topic which, sad to say, my cat has a better grasp of, putting you at a distinct disadvantage.

    And with human speech clearly also being a second (maybe third?) language for you, well, let’s just say you really are a plucky little fellow coming out at all, aren’t you?

    (And clever, too, eluding the staff like that!)

    Being expected to compete with those with functioning cerebral cortexes is clearly making you become rather agitated and incontinent. Might we perhaps even the playing field: could we consult you on some topics where you may actually have some expertise?

    Let’s try!

    Which anti-psychotics are you on? (They’re clearly not effective. Perhaps up the dose?).

    Is there a particular brand of adult diaper you’d recommend?

    Or genital cuff?

    Do you find that sponges at the corners of the mouth work best for managing the drool, or perhaps you’ve experimented with suction?

    Look, anyway, I reckon I can hear nurse calling, so off you run – and when you come back, do make sure you’ve got your big boy pants on next time, eh?

  5. #5 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    bbd asshole: i don’t look at graphs with corrupt data from climate scientology church

    did you get it?

    i don’t look it for health reasons, one get’s infected with all the methodological flaws from your climate scientology church

    Oh my sides. You utter clown!

    You don’t even understand that Spencer and Christy are sceptics!

    And the satellite data set they curate *validates* the surface temperature reconstructions.

    So all your ranting shite is irrelevant and it’s sceptics that demonstrate that you are a fuckwit! Not me!

    That’s what’s so funny, and that’s why your ridiculous refusal to look at the graph is so ironic.

    You really need to look at the graph!

    Truly, a clownshoe among clownshoes. Priceless.

    :-)

    a: which temperature stations he has taken per year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    b: why he had chosen certain temperature stations and left out others per year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    c: how he had changed the raw temperature data of the chosen temperature stations per station and year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    WHO OF THE CLIMATE MORONS DARES TO ANSWER THOSE 3 QUESTIONS????

    SHOW SOME COURAGE, FUCKWIT CRAPS

  6. #6 chameleon
    July 1, 2013

    Seriously moderators?
    I await moderation?
    You must be joking?
    WTF are the rules?

  7. #7 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    All dealt with by one simple graph. So in the shitcan it goes, again.

    Remember, one is sampling a large planet with imperfect tools at flawed land sites and with almost NO useful oceanic data. Antarctica was terra incognita; much of the Arctic, much of Siberia, much of China, even large parts of Canada and the United States were virtually unmeasured except in very specific locations back in the 19th century. Only satellite measurements of LTT and ARGO measurements in the last decade form anything like defensibly precise measures of global temperature without unknown UHI and method/sampling errors, and ARGO is by no means stable yet in its results and still horrendously undersamples the surface area of the sea.

    before you continue to spread your usual fucking bullshit, you must understand why your faith basis is so insanely corrupt.

    your speculation about human harm to nature is the most stupid nonsense anthropoid brains have ever invented. you alarm fuckwits are such a ridiculous nonsense, not consense, community. i am sure you will undergo purgatory and punishment by satan for all your incredible unmoralities and unethicalities

    Sigh.

  8. #8 Bernard J.
    July 1, 2013

    Freddy must be a poe.

    No-one as stupid as he pretends to be could actually power up a computer and log onto his ISP.

  9. #9 freddy
    July 1, 2013

    since all you science deniers from the fucking agw scientology church are incapacitated enough to answer my simple questions:

    why does phil jones not disclose

    a: which temperature stations he has taken per year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    b: why he had chosen certain temperature stations and left out others per year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    c: how he had changed the raw temperature data of the chosen temperature stations per station and year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    i give you now a simpler question, which will require your whole rudimentary knowledge, to answer:

    among all you eco-shit-disciplines are you aware of any study which investigates a possible correlation between the level of believed global warming and the percentage of gay climate scientologists among all climate scientologists. in other words, are there more homosexuals in the agw scientology church than in any truely scientific discipline. my hypothesis would be that inclinatiion to a warmer world correlates with warming behavior of the subjects who try to support the agw climate scientology ideology

    answers welcome, you fucking assholes

  10. #10 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    why does phil jones not disclose

    It doesn’t matter.

    You could verify this for yourself in less than five seconds by looking at that graph. But you refuse and so exile yourself from rational debate.

    What I showed you renders your blather irrelevant. I get the impression you are so insane and so stupid that you actually don’t understand what was demonstrated, but it’s extremely hard to tell.

    Whatever the case, you operate below the level at which meaningful interaction can take place.

    Unless you stop screaming abuse and start looking at the data and evidence you will stay forever in the claustrophobic, malodorous darkness you inhabit now.

    Rather you than me.

  11. #11 freddy
    July 1, 2013

    bbd climate doomer:

    i am always looking “at the data and evidence”

    BUT YOU SCIENCE DENIERS NOT. THAT’S THE PROBLEM WITH YOU IGNORANTS. YOU ONLY BELIEVE WHAT OTHER CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGISTS HAVE DIGESTED FOR YOU.

  12. #12 chek
    July 1, 2013

    in other words, are there more homosexuals in the agw scientology church than in any truely scientific discipline.

    Not a science discipline, but Betty ‘child deniers’ Betula has already volunteered that he can’t turn around without bumping into a gay US Marine.

    Is that due to AGW warming or does a preference for lycra follow the warming? Bit of a chicken and egg question it seems to me.,

  13. #13 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    i am always looking “at the data and evidence”

    No, freddy, this is what’s technically known as a “fucking lie”.

    Just a few comments back, you refused to look at a comparison of satellite TLT temperature with surface temperature that demonstrates that the surface temperature data sets are not seriously in error.

    You are dishonest, stupid and insane. You have wasted more than enough space here – now fuck off please.

  14. #14 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    YOU ONLY BELIEVE WHAT OTHER CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGISTS HAVE DIGESTED FOR YOU.

    Oh Stupid One:

    Christy and Spencer at UAH are sceptics and vocal critics of the IPCC. That’s why the UAH satellite reconstruction is such a fair test of the surface reconstructions. If *anyone* was going to catch out any fakery in those data sets, it would be Christy and Spencer. Depend on that.

    I keep on telling you this. You keep on not hearing me.

    You are very, very stupid.

  15. #15 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    UAH TLT, GISTEMP, HadCRUT4 1979 – present; monthly means; common 1981 – 2010 baseline

    Look! GISTEMP and UAH TLT have exactly the same trend since 1979.

    HadCRUT4 is a very close match over the same period.

    Remember, Christy and Spencer are SCEPTICS and we are comparing SATELLITE data with surface measurements.

    Try to penetrate the self-generated fog of insanity and denial and LOOK at the evidence.

  16. #16 freddy
    July 1, 2013

    bbd fuckwit, all what you climate crook try to say has nothing at all to with my questions. here they are again for you pain in the ass without any reading comprehension:

    why does phil jones not disclose
    a: which temperature stations he has taken per year to calculate a mean global temperature?
    b: why he had chosen certain temperature stations and left out others per year to calculate a mean global temperature?
    c: how he had changed the raw temperature data of the chosen temperature stations per station and year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    stop telling me about x, y, z when i ask about jones procedures to calculate his global temperature!!!!!

    I ONLY WANT METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY FROM ALL PLAYERS IN THE CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH. I RAISED PRECISE QUESTIONS ABOUT JONES TO WHICH YOU IDIOTICALLY WIND TO GIVE ANSWERS, YOU FUCKING SHIT.

  17. #17 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    Oh just fuck off, fred-fred.

  18. #18 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    Enough of this shit.

    bbd fuckwit, all what you climate crook try to say has nothing at all to with my questions. here they are again for you pain in the ass without any reading comprehension:

    why does phil jones not disclose
    a: which temperature stations he has taken per year to calculate a mean global temperature?
    b: why he had chosen certain temperature stations and left out others per year to calculate a mean global temperature?
    c: how he had changed the raw temperature data of the chosen temperature stations per station and year to calculate a mean global temperature?

    stop telling me about x, y, z when i ask about jones procedures to calculate his global temperature!!!!!

    I ONLY WANT METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY FROM ALL PLAYERS IN THE CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH. I RAISED PRECISE QUESTIONS ABOUT JONES TO WHICH YOU IDIOTICALLY WIND TO GIVE ANSWERS, YOU FUCKING SHIT.

  19. #19 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    A certain lazy and insane troll needs to get on with his own homework instead of being a pain in the arse in comments here.

    Here’s a starting point:

    How are the hemispheric and global anomaly series calculated?

    Values for the hemisphere are the weighted average of all the non-missing, grid-box anomalies in each hemisphere. The weights used are the cosines of the central latitudes of each grid box. The global average for CRUTEM4 and CRUTEM4v is a weighted average of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and Southern Hemisphere (SH). The weights are 2 for the NH and one for the SH. For CRUTEM3 and CRUTEM3v, the global average is the average of the NH and SH values. For HadCRUT4, HadCRUT3 and HadCRUT3v the global average is the average of the NH and SH values. In the time series files, the second row of integers is the percentage of the surface area covered for each month from 1850.

    What are the basic raw data used?

    For land regions of the world over 4800 monthly station temperature time series are used. Coverage is denser over the more populated parts of the world, particularly, the United States, southern Canada, Europe and Japan. Coverage is sparsest over the interior of the South American and African continents and over the Antarctic. The number of available stations was small during the 1850s, but increases to over 4500 stations during the 1951-2010 period. For marine regions sea surface temperature (SST) measurements taken on board merchant and some naval vessels are used. As the majority come from the voluntary observing fleet, coverage is reduced away from the main shipping lanes and is minimal over the Southern Oceans. Improvements in coverage occur after 1980 through the deployment of fixed and drifting buoys. The development of the datasets is extensively discussed in Jones et al. (2012) and Kennedy et al. (2011). Both these sources also extensively discuss the issue of consistency and homogeneity of the measurements through time and the steps that have been made to ensure all non-climatic inhomogeneities have been removed.

    Raw station data are available from the Met Office website for both CRUTEM4 and CRUTEM3.

  20. #20 chek
    July 1, 2013

    Is it me or is Freddy Fuckwit revisiting 2006 all over again?
    Certainly chumming the same old things over and over is a denier strategy and, as we now know, a hallmark of the insane. Considering it wasn’t his field, Einstein was right on the money about hoping for different outcomes. His addendum should have been ‘and not succeeding’, just to make it absolutely plain to the chummers.

  21. #21 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    For fred-fred, life is an eternal present. As it is for a goldfish.

  22. #22 Lionel A
    July 1, 2013

    Well Freddy, you sure have a way with words, a way which demonstrates what a shouty, paranoid, ignorant twerp you are.

    I have been away for awhile, just returned from an area demonstrating climate stress, and find this thread filling up with your detritus (you may have to look that up in a dictionary, that is after asking somebody what a dictionary is).

    You have the temerity (look that up in your dictionary too) to throw this out

    I RAISED PRECISE QUESTIONS ABOUT JONES TO WHICH YOU IDIOTICALLY WIND TO GIVE ANSWERS, YOU FUCKING SHIT.

    which shows only that you need to take your med’s.

    Whatever, the following illustrates quite clearly what an ideologically perverted individual you are,

    I ONLY WANT METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY FROM ALL PLAYERS IN THE CLIMATE SCIENTOLOGY CHURCH…

    one who has clearly not developed the ability to think for themselves.

    To be honest I cannot be bothered to trawl through your particular brand of diarrhea, you are one sick budgie.

    Why don’t you do something useful and go fight fires in, say, Arizona?

  23. #23 BBD
    July 1, 2013

    Good to see you back, Lionel. Was wondering.

  24. #24 chek
    July 1, 2013

    Professor Freddy the fuckwit (you don’t want to read that far back) is harmless enough |Lionel.

    Thread polluting but harmless re-runs from yesteryear. Although like most novelty acts and one-hit-wonders, knowing when the jokes done and to stop flogging their dead dick seems to elude them.

  25. #25 freddy
    July 2, 2013

    lionnell asshole, fire in arizona is agw of course

    PROOF IT, MORON !!!!!!!!

  26. #26 Bernard J.
    July 2, 2013

    Freddy.

    Faux or genuine, you are a very seriously damaged individual.

    Go seek specialist help.

  27. #27 bill
    July 2, 2013

    given the consistent sub-literacy of his clearly unrevised rantings, i’m particularly enjoying the irony of ‘PROOF IT’!

  28. #28 bill
    July 2, 2013

    ‘lionel’ and ‘PROVE’, since you asked, petal!

  29. #29 Jeff Harvey
    July 2, 2013

    “lionnell asshole, fire in arizona is agw of course
    PROOF IT, MORON !!!!!!!!'”

    And to think Freddy once claimed he had a PhD. Certainly his crap is ‘piled higher and deeper’ than evenm that spewed out here by most of the climate change deniers.

    Truth is, Freddy is a lunatic. A bonafide fruitcake. It is impossible to take anything he says remotely seriously because he is so over the top that his posts become self-parodies.

  30. #30 Lionel A
    July 2, 2013

    freddy, a real Aunt Sally, raves with this gibberish:

    lionnell [sic] asshole [ROTFL], fire in arizona is agw of course

    PROOF IT, MORON !!!!!!!!

    The Arizona fire was set by a lightning strike on tinder dry vegetation.

    Now ask yourself, sorry go find out, why climate change increases the risks of both droughts and an increase in incidence of electrical storms.

    But of course you won’t because you are a class act in tom fullery having learned your language from the likes of Faux pundits and Mark ‘the mouth’ aka a’hole Morano.

    You need to polish your act freddy, it is a bit rough around the edges.

  31. #31 BBD
    July 2, 2013

    Lionel A

    Here’s one of the several analyses at Tamino’s that demonstrates the point clearly.

    And here’s another.

    I’m addressing my comment to you because the troll refuses to examine any evidence (see upthread). So there’s no point in presenting him with any as his mind is closed tighter than the proverbial crab’s fundament.

  32. #32 Lionel A
    July 2, 2013

    Indeed BBD, Climate Central is another of my goto’s, as is Tamino’s place of course.

    BTW ‘crab’s fundament‘? It was always a ‘ducks fundament’ to we in the RN.

  33. #33 BBD
    July 2, 2013

    The Senior Service has its venerable traditions and far from me to question them. There are, however, diverse views on this. I’ve heard several variants: seal; otter; penguin, even frog, – à chacun son goût…

    :-)

  34. #34 David Duff
    This Septic Isle
    July 7, 2013

    Hello, little Deltoids! You will notice that I have waited until this afternoon before posting because, of course, on Sunday mornings you all gather in the Chapel to chant things like “I belieeeeve! I belieeeeve” and I am always a great respecter of religion.

    But, I wanted to say ‘thank you’ for this dose of global warming we’re all enjoying. Well, I know we’re not supposed to actually ‘enjoy’ it but the fact is that most of us do and the only problem for the last 15 or so years is that we haven’t had any!

    Perhaps, next Sunday when you go to Chapel you could pray to the great Mann-God for a bit more global warming, well, I mean, he keeps forecasting it but somehow it never quite happens. Anyway, sorry to interrupt, carry on chanting!

  35. #35 el gordo
    August 5, 2013

    Gaia! Gaia! Gaia!