August 2013 Open thread

More thread.

Comments

  1. #1 Luke
    September 8, 2013

    #84 BBD – yes and I hope you keep thinking that. Tell you what though – you’re keen, you’re fascinated – and you can’t leave it alone. There’s that nagging thought – what if he’s right.

  2. #2 Berendaneke
    September 8, 2013

    @BBD

    So GISTEMP has been tampered with in order to bring it into extremely close agreement with the UAH satellite data curated by outspoken sceptics Roy Spencer and John Christy?!

    And the UK HadCRUT4 dataset has been got at too!

    Look at the linked graphs, idiot and don’t play your preferred cheating game of mixing cherrypicked methodologies, you nutter: sarellite data is not temperature readings of thermometers 2m above the surface, you big idiot. Why the fuck is your brain so limited to understand this, full-blown bollocks moron.

  3. #3 BBD
    September 8, 2013

    #2

    Um, why can’t you see that when two different methodologies produce results in close agreement, confidence in the combined result increases?

    The satellite data confirm the surface temperature reconstructions. Look at the linked graph, idiot.

    No cheating. No cherry-picking.

  4. #4 BBD
    September 8, 2013

    #1

    There’s that nagging thought – what if he’s right.

    There’s that nagging thought that paleoclimate behaviour – not models – demonstrates that CO2 is an efficacious forcing. Paleoclimate behaviour is hard, if not impossible to explain if S_ff to 2xCO2 is less than ~2C. Paleoclimate behaviour is strongly suggestive that S_ff/2xCO2is probably closer to ~3C.

  5. #5 Berendaneke
    September 8, 2013

    I knew that the nutter BBD is unable to understand the linked graphs showing NOAA and GISS data manipulations, and scoundrel BBD justifies the fraud with a totally different cherrypicked satellite dataset from a creationist, BBD fool and mentally impaired idiot. Your intelligence is the lowest of any participant here on deltoid. You lost the climate war already, idiot and your son will call you a scoundrel and will be ashamed of such an awful spin father. Piss off, you unspeakable idiot and some decent work to earn some little money., unstead of hanging around in the internet 24×7 and giving such a miserable example for your son, idiot.

  6. #6 chek
    September 8, 2013

    Yup, only intellects of the calibre of Freddyfred and SpamKan could see through it, but as in any episode of Scoooby Doo, those pesky morons ….

  7. #7 Luke
    September 8, 2013

    ” strongly suggestive” HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA

    that was good …..

  8. #8 Luke
    September 8, 2013

    Everything about palaeo is a model of something you stupid git

  9. #9 Berendaneke
    September 8, 2013

    Regardless of what you, chek, BBD, Harvey, Barnturd, Lionel, Loathsome, etc. write here: YOU ARE THE IDIOTS.

    And the funny thing is, that you don’t understand why you are the idiots here!

    hahahahaha, hahahaa, hahahaha

    AGW Doltoid idiots don’t know why they are the idiots:

    hooo hahahh, hoooo hahahaha

    BBD the poor boss of the climate idiots, hahahahahha
    chek, the ignoramus clerk of the religious movement
    some elder greenpissers, adlady etc.

    hahahaha, what an idiotic gang.

  10. #10 Turboblocke
    September 8, 2013

    Looks like the BL tag team are off their meds.

  11. #11 BBD
    September 8, 2013

    Everything about palaeo is a model of something you stupid git

    Well obviously, but you seem to have a problem with AOGCMs. That is what I was driving at.

  12. #12 BBD
    September 8, 2013

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA

    The bray, again.

    Come on, Luke. Evolve.

  13. #13 chek
    September 8, 2013

    The Lukes, every visualisation of *anything* using data is a ‘model’.
    What moronic point are you trying to make?

  14. #14 Lotharsson
    September 9, 2013
  15. #15 Lotharsson
    September 9, 2013

    I’m repeatedly impressed, based on some of Luke’s scientifically clueless comments (hey look, another one on this page!), that he apparently thought he could get away with passing himself off as a “working scientist”.

    If we presume for the moment that he actually wanted the claim to be taken seriously, what kind of thought process must he have gone through (if any) in which he pondered whether he could pull the wool over the eyes of this blog’s readership…and then concluded that he could?

  16. #16 Craig Thomas
    September 9, 2013

    What surprises me is to see “Luke” continuing to post as late as 8 September.

    I had assumed his/their commission was to expire on 7 September.

  17. #17 Lotharsson
    September 9, 2013

    I don’t think he has another gig lined up, Craig. It’s not like there’s a lot of demand for those kinds of services outside of an election period.

  18. #18 Berendaneke
    September 9, 2013

    @Craig Thomas

    please post your crap on the September page, as nobody will ever read this junk here

    :roll:

  19. #19 Lionel A
    September 9, 2013

    Well whadayouknow:

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA

    and

    hahahahaha, hahahaa, hahahaha

    luke and Berendaneke are bird’s of this feather after all with the latter being the inspiration for the B side, the latter part of that recording.

  20. #20 Stu
    September 9, 2013

    please post your crap on the September page, as nobody will ever read this junk here

    Freddy, you don’t even know where you are anymore. Take your meds.

  21. #21 Stu
    September 9, 2013

    Whoa, *I* don’t even know where I am anymore!

    Time for my meds.

  22. #22 Luke
    September 9, 2013

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  23. #23 chek
    September 9, 2013

    The Lukes, workin’. those index fingers as if it means something. Other than being the universal bray of moron deniers whose grey matter has been drained dry..

  24. #24 Craig Thomas
    September 9, 2013

    Luke, between jobs, continues to post, albeit with even less content than usual.

  25. #25 Craig Thomas
    September 9, 2013

    I’m looking forward to the first anti-government demonstration to come in Canberra – I am picturing a large banner with a picture of an old pervert holding a gimp on a leash, with the following words,
    TONY ABBOTT:
    RUPERT MURDOCH’s BITCH

  26. #26 pentaxZ
    September 16, 2013

    Seven open threads in a row. That must be some kind of record high.

  27. #27 pentaxZ
    September 16, 2013

    And so, finally, this pseudoscientific blog is dead. About time!

Current ye@r *