Now on ScienceBlogs: Spirited Debate with Ray and Kirk

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Profile

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.

markhoofnagle.jpg Mark Hoofnagle has a MD and PhD in physiology from the University of Virginia, and is now a general surgery resident. His interest in denialism concerns the use of denialist tactics to confuse public understanding of scientific knowledge.

Chris Hoofnagle Chris Hoofnagle is a recovering Washington, DC lawyer and information privacy law expert at UC-Berkeley Law School. Denialism became apparent to him while working on consumer protection laws in Washington. The Denialists' Deck of Cards is essentially a how-to guide for being an industry lobbyist.

PalMD.jpgPalMD is a practicing internist in the Midwestern United States. Aside from the great joy he finds in his family and his work, he likes communicating some of that joy to others. He has a special interest in the ways patients---and we are all patients at one time or another---are deceived by charlatans. He aims to change the world, one reader at a time. Previous writings can still be found here.

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.


HONcode Certified

This blog is hosted by SEED Media Group; ad space on the top and right side belongs to them. The rest of the content is HONcode certified.

This website is accredited by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Blog carnivals

  • asclepius_phixr%282%29.jpg
  • BadgeMed.jpg

    Other

    « Two links for you | Main | Transparency in Propriety Info Databases, or Did the Pizza Place Sell Your Cell Phone Number? »

    Uncommon Descent breaks my irony meter yet again

    Category: Wasting your time
    Posted on: November 12, 2007 4:17 PM, by MarkH

    BarryA at Uncommon Descent talks about a startling finding using this tool the blog readability test.

    Thanks to one of our commenters for pointing out this website that calculates the reading level of blogs. Just for fun I inserted UD and it came back "High School," which means that the general discussion at this blog is at a high school level. I then inserted Pandas Thumb and it came back "Elementary School."

    Make of this what you will.

    Interesting, when I insert pandasthumb.org I get College/Post Grad. Oh wait, I forgot, the people at UD are morons. They put in Pandasthumb.com, an unregistered domain.

    Now granted, this is a really stupid metric, that doesn't really say much of anything, but you'd think these geniuses could at least criticize the right website. The only lesson here is never take anything the evolution denialists cdesign proponentsists say at face value.

    Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

    Comments

    1

    No, I'd say that the lesson is that creationists are an infinite time, energy and sanity sink and it's best to just ignore them if you value your allocation of any of these resources.

    Posted by: Ian B Gibson | November 12, 2007 5:08 PM

    2

    That's what we thought a few decades ago, Ian. Didn't really get us anywhere.

    Posted by: Bronze Dog | November 12, 2007 10:11 PM

    3

    www.talkorigins.org gets a "Genius" level.

    Posted by: Scott | November 13, 2007 12:21 AM

    4

    The only lesson here is never take anything the evolution denialists cdesign proponentsists say at face value.

    There's also the lesson that creationists are a really stupid bunch.

    Posted by: small words for small minds | November 13, 2007 7:17 AM

    5

    Shouldn't the good guys hustle to register the pandasthumb.com name before some major intellect (relatively speaking) among the creationists starts getting what passes for a brilliant brainstorm in their circles regarding potential prankery?

    Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | November 13, 2007 10:09 AM

    6

    I kind of wish the real Panda's Thumb website had returned an elementary reading level. Wouldn't that reinforce the point that evolution is such common sense that even a fifth grader can understand it?

    Posted by: Harry Abernathy | November 13, 2007 12:04 PM

    7

    That thread was particularly illuminating. Dembski chimed in with a site that would check a block of text against the Flesch-Kincaid readability indicator. Now why would Dembski know about such a thing? He isn't an editor for USA Today, and he isn't a (real) educator.

    I have this creeping feeling that Dembski modifies his "math" until it scores below a 10 on the readability indicator so that he can delude himself into thinking it's bona fide scholarship while ensuring that his bafflegab is baffling enough.

    Posted by: Dustin | November 13, 2007 5:46 PM

    8

    s bafflegab is baffling enough.

    ok

    Posted by: testing | November 20, 2007 9:15 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
    Visit the Collective Imagination blog
    Advertisement
    Collective Imagination

    © 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

    Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM