Now on ScienceBlogs: The Australian's War on Science 41

Seed Media Group

Profile

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.

markhoofnagle.jpg Mark Hoofnagle has a MD and PhD in physiology from the University of Virginia, and is now a general surgery resident. His interest in denialism concerns the use of denialist tactics to confuse public understanding of scientific knowledge.

Chris Hoofnagle Chris Hoofnagle is a recovering Washington, DC lawyer and information privacy law expert at UC-Berkeley Law School. Denialism became apparent to him while working on consumer protection laws in Washington. The Denialists' Deck of Cards is essentially a how-to guide for being an industry lobbyist.

PalMD.jpgPalMD is a practicing internist in the Midwestern United States. Aside from the great joy he finds in his family and his work, he likes communicating some of that joy to others. He has a special interest in the ways patients---and we are all patients at one time or another---are deceived by charlatans. He aims to change the world, one reader at a time. Previous writings can still be found here.

Please read the DISCLAIMERS.


HONcode Certified

This blog is hosted by SEED Media Group; ad space on the top and right side belongs to them. The rest of the content is HONcode certified.

This website is accredited by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Blog carnivals

  • asclepius_phixr%282%29.jpg
  • BadgeMed.jpg

    Other

    « Is that really a disease? Epistemology and crank-ism | Main | More JPANDS lies---Godwin, here we come »

    Autism cranks going after bloggers

    Category: Cranks
    Posted on: April 3, 2008 6:06 PM, by PalMD

    It's time to open up a can of Streisand. The author of the autism blog Neurodiversity, along with many other blogs and other online entities, has been subpoenaed to produce what amounts to her entire life to aid in some frivolous autism suit. The only thing they didn't ask her to do was submit to a speculum exam (don't get any ideas, bastards!).

    This is truly outrageous. It is a clear attempt by a group of (forgive me, please PP) demented fucking wackaloons to intimidate a humble New Englander who enjoys writing.

    Time to get the word out!

    (Hat tip LizDitz)

    Addendum:

    Orac and others have pointed out that the lawyer involved is the real bad guy here. It's hard to blame devastated parents, but this Clifford Shoemaker guy should be ashamed of himself.

    Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

    Comments

    1

    Unbelievable. This case is unbelievable. I wrote something about it here.

    Let's spread the word.

    Posted by: Jake Young | April 3, 2008 7:58 PM

    3

    http://www.californiacoastline.org/images/2002/small/3850.JPG

    So could we maybe we call up a certain lawyer and ask him politely if he knows the definition of the Streisand effect?

    Posted by: Me 2 cranky | April 3, 2008 11:35 PM

    4

    This is definitely getting out of hand... I hope someone can give Kathleen some good legal advice.

    Posted by: Nick Dellhall | April 4, 2008 3:01 AM

    5

    Thanks, y'all.

    Posted by: Kathleen Seidel | April 4, 2008 6:08 AM

    6

    There is a poll available at the legal site asking:

    Do you believe that thimerosol in vaccines has contributed to the autism epidemic? Yes NO

    Currently at 75% in favor of NO.

    Consider promoting the poll.

    Posted by: Anonymous | April 4, 2008 2:36 PM

    7

    Science isn't a matter of public opinion.

    Posted by: PalMD Author Profile Page | April 4, 2008 3:05 PM

    8

    Two sentence's at the Shoemaker & Associates site told me all I need to know about these people:

    "If you believe your child developed autism as the result of vaccine received, there are certain things you should know. First, you need to determine whether you can file a timely claim..."

    Really? I'd figure the first thing you would need to determine is whether or not that's a legitimate belief. The way that's phrased makes it sound like Shoemaker & Associates' motto should be "Litigate them all and let God sort them out."

    Posted by: Will K. | April 5, 2008 7:46 PM

    9

    I'm not sure which does the most harm to our society-- lawyers being allowed to advertise their services or pharmaceutical companies being able to advertise their pills.

    Posted by: Bill | April 5, 2008 9:17 PM

    10

    They took the poll off the site. Damn. That was fun while it lasted.

    Posted by: Madam Ovary | April 6, 2008 5:55 PM

    11

    Re Will K's comment: I see a bumper sticker...

    A cartoon of a speeding ambulance followed by an attorney waving a legal paper:

    Above: "Chase 'em all - let the courts sort 'em out"

    Below: "Thank you for helping a lawyer buy his next Lexus"

    Perhaps we could have a competition to find the most appropriate variant.

    Posted by: Dr Aust | April 7, 2008 7:03 AM

    Post a Comment

    (Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





    ScienceBlogs

    Search ScienceBlogs:

    Go to:

    Advertisement
    Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
    Visit the Collective Imagination blog
    Advertisement
    Enter to win

    © 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

    Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM